Which of these cops safeguarded Constitutional rights? Which of these cops TRAMPLED those rights? Do you think either of these cops did what is right? Are they making America a better place? Orig vids 1. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSn5SPwHLG8 2. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pwTxZaMuf0 Support the channel: ✅ https://cash.app/$HighImpactDonate ☕️ Buy me a coffee or two: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/HighImpactFlix ⭐ SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/highimpactflix 🔴 Grab a Hard-Hitting Original Design: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlix-Merch 📬 Snail Mail: P.O. Box 1454 Tahlequah, Ok 74465 📬 ⭐ SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/highimpactflix 🔵 Private Email List: http://bit.ly/HighImpactFlixOfficial (don't forget to CONFIRM) 🔵 Email: contact@HighImpactFlix.com ** Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighImpactFlix Equipment I use: ** VanTrue N4 3 Channel Dash Cam: https://amzn.to/3COn0LQ ** VanTrue GPS Module: https://amzn.to/3kSvKur ** Insta360 One X2 Camera: https://amzn.to/3iLZ2tw ** Slim Body cam: https://amzn.to/3kjqoaO ** Full Body Cam 2: https://amzn.to/3Wvy9YC ** Monopod: https://amzn.to/3GHq4KD ** Magnetic Body Cam Mount: https://amzn.to/3Dqv8lM ***Music Intro Credit https://dessherwood.hearnow.com/ email: des.sherwood@btinternet.com web site: www.dessherwood.com youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCC6AhNFQ4RjO6hXSwWP3vew This video is intended for educational and entertainment purposes ONLY and is in no way meant to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. Nothing in this video should be considered a "call to action." It was created to educate individuals on constitutionally protected activities, case law and individual rights and emphasize the important roll legal action plays in constitutional activism as well as the importance of constitutional awareness. With this in mind, the facts presented in my videos are not necessarily indicative of my personal opinion in all cases, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. None of my videos be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them. FAIR USE This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

1st amendment first amendment constitution freedom of speech freedom of press press news journalism journalist audit the audit police the police audit the police police accountability dashcam dash cam bodycam body cam id refusal cops owned lackluster first amendment audit activist activists police fails 2a audit second amendment audit cops get owned tyrant lawsuit money ai police activity second amendment law enforcement cops live pd