Channel operation
- Elapsed time
- 0s
- Estimated remaining
- Estimating…
No changes saved yet.
Keep this page open while work is running. Estimates change with channel size; leaving may interrupt unsaved work.
View results
Woman Argues with a Bouncer at D’Jais and Gets Arrested
Transparency Bodycam | 2024-11-13
Description
Around 12:37 AM on May 5, 2024, Sergeant Philip Bohrman with the Belmar Police Department observed a staff member of D’Jais escorting a 24-year-old woman outside of the bar. The woman was an off duty employee of D’Jais. The staff member advised her why she was being asked to leave, and she became ar...
Around 12:37 AM on May 5, 2024, Sergeant Philip Bohrman with the Belmar Police Department observed a staff member of D’Jais escorting a 24-year-old woman outside of the bar. The woman was an off duty employee of D’Jais. The staff member advised her why she was being asked to leave, and she became argumentative. Sergeant Bohrman told her to just leave so that she would not have to be arrested. However, she refused to heed their warnings to leave the property and returned to the front door again. After arguing with the officers for a few minutes, Sergeant Bohrman placed her under arrest for interference with business and disorderly conduct. Patrolman Patrick McGill brought his patrol car to the scene and the officers escorted the woman to the car. The woman was transported by Patrolman McGill to the Belmar Police Department for further processing. After they were finished with their paperwork and she was photographed, she was released to a friend pending her court appearance. The woman was issued summonses for the following offenses: interfere with business (Belmar Ordinance 16-26), and disorderly conduct (2C:33-2A(1)) Court records indicate that on June 26, 2024, she was found guilty of violating Ordinance 16-26. As a result of being found guilty, she had to pay a total of $790 in fines. The other summons for disorderly conduct was dismissed as part of a plea agreement. ---------------------------------------------- Please LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, and consider supporting this channel (email us for more information). Our content is shared for educational and news gathering purposes. We are in compliance with YouTube's Fair Use Policy because we edit several long clips into a concise story. This is similar to other law enforcement channels on YouTube. All videos and case documents were obtained pursuant to the New Jersey Open Public Records Act, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq. (P.L. 2024, c.16). Defendants are considered innocent until proven guilty. The New Jersey Supreme Court has previously affirmed in Salzano v. North Jersey Media Group, 993 A.2d 778 (2010) that “The fair-report privilege reflects the judgment that the need, in a self-governing society, for free-flowing information about matters of public interest outweighs concerns over the uncompensated injury to a person's reputation.” This video advances a compelling public interest. The summary of events was based on records that are “open to public view through open access to public records” as defined in the Salzano case. In Ramos v. Flowers, 429 N.J. Super. 13, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court has also affirmed the right to film law enforcement interactions.
Tags
Transcripts
AddResources
AddCharacters
AddNotes
AddQuick Actions
Event Details
EditStats History
| Date | Views | Likes |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-27 | 45,617 | 1,354 |
Danger Zone
These actions cannot be undone.