On September 12, 2024, officers in Sebastian, Florida responded to a two-vehicle crash after a driver turned the wrong way onto a one-way street. What began as a crash investigation escalated into a DUI investigation — and ultimately an arrest for resisting a law enforcement officer without violence, after the subject refused to hang up her phone. In this episode, we break down every legal issue: Was the resisting charge legally supported under Florida Statute § 843.02? Were the field sobriety exercises administered correctly? Was the implied consent warning proper? And how should officers handle subjects who disclose medical conditions during FSE evaluation? Outcome: Convicted — 15 days jail, 12 months probation, 50 hours community service, 12-month license suspension, DUI classes. This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Sources: - Bodycam footage released via public records request - Florida Statute § 316.193 (DUI) - Florida Statute § 843.02 (Resisting Without Violence) - Florida Statute § 316.1932 (Implied Consent) - Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) - Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) - NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Manual #BodycamFootage #PoliceBodycam #DUIInvestigation #FieldSobrietyTest #ResistingArrest #FloridaLaw #MirandaRights #LegalAnalysis #PoliceAccountability #DUIArrest

bodycam footage police bodycam DUI investigation field sobriety test resisting arrest Florida law Sebastian Florida implied consent Miranda rights Graham v Connor NHTSA walk and turn test one leg stand HGN test audit the audit L vs R legal analysis police accountability DUI arrest traffic crash bodycam 2024