MediaMatrix
Home
Channels
Videos
YouTube
Import New Channel
Update Existing Channel
Update All Channel Videos
Import Missing Videos
YouTube API Settings
API Docs
Quick Actions
Add Channel
Add Video
YouTube
Import New Channel
Update Channel Videos
Update All Channel Videos
Home
Edit Transcript - Sovereign Citizens Ignorance of the 4A Leads to Arrests at Court
Home
Videos
Sovereign Citizens Ignorance of the 4A Leads to Arrests at Court
Edit Transcript
Edit Transcript
Language
Format
Source
Auto-generated
Yes
Confidence
Content
welcome back to the channel today we are looking at a video posted by a channel called it's pauline cuffs sorry i mean it's paul unslaved i do apologize this guy lives in cuffs so i automatically associate him with handcuffs anyway he's accompanying his friend and he's at the corp he says to collect discovery but they both object to going through the security protocols uh because they believe it violates the fourth amendment right let's get into it all these people need to be arrested trespassing [Music] we were armed sir it's lawful to be armed that's fine you know this is america we do have a second amendment right and these individuals want to search us right unlawful search and seizure in order to access the courthouse that everyone pays for they are public servants and they are on so when did public servants get more rights and abilities than the men and women they serve is kind of my question you seem to have substituted the word unreasonable for the word unlawful for some reason the fourth amendment is easy to remember i'm not even from the united states and i can remember the fourth amendment off the top of my head so it makes me a little suspicious when i see a guy who talks about the constitution almost dearly get it significantly wrong i'm just saying okay can you guys answer me this question are you guys no are you i don't answer questions sir and like i said even if i was armed it's completely lawful to be armed just like you gentlemen are armed in a public service capacity okay especially like this that's not a problem so are you saying this is a private building are you saying this is a private building that's policy sir that's not law are you saying this is a private building because we have a federal lawsuit that's you still have to um and who says that where does that person not where does that come from sir where does the delegation of authority come from delegation of authority you've been watching too many morris sovereign citizen videos the city of denver is the city of denver is paid for the city of denver okay the city of denver is a is a what you need you need to learn the difference between lawful and legal i know the difficulty that's a that's a legal procedure sir don't go in the building so we can't access our courthouse following the law as long as you go along with the rules if not you can't just go in there and do it so rules out rank though i will well i want to see you try it to see how far you get up those steps because we haven't seen a soft seat getting tased in ages or you could just stop acting like a couple of man babies suck it up and stop causing a drama it's not unreasonable yes paul that is a word unreasonable and it's in the fourth amendment it's not unreasonable under the fourth amendment to go through security in a courthouse i'll be here tomorrow you want to be here i'll be here i just have one question i just have one question so rules out outrank the law of the land sir is that what you're saying the policy is important so policy outranks the law of the land this building is paid for by the men and women of this this building i heard what you said but it's unlawful sir can we just have a conversation we could if this man would check his ego because he's talking over me sir i don't think it's possible for anyone to talk any louder than you were you told to be quiet as a kid and as a result now you're rebelling by shouting every word he's got a point to prove he's not interested in the truth and the law of the land he's interested in policy enforcement policy is not law right legal and lawful yeah i do you don't know the law what makes you think that you would know more because you've done a policy enforcement job for x amount of years have you ever actually hit the books and looked at the difference between legal and lawful you do realize the police aren't the ones who write the laws they only enforce them take it up with the legislature if you don't like how things are run i don't make sense when i'm talking that's interesting because i have a 30-year sergeant over in that courthouse and another 30-year sergeant another one who said thank you for doing the work you're doing you're getting the other public servants together so it's interesting how prove it i have it on video sir would you like i'll give you my youtube channel you can check it out even if this encounter with the sergeant did happen it doesn't make what you're saying true it's likely that you just didn't pick up that the sergeant was humor in you or he was being sarcastic i i find it hard to believe that he even got a word in with you because you talk over people so much it's probably a figment of your imagination or you dreamt it or something you can check it out of course you don't watch youtube because you're probably watching television oh fake news give us more about your bias go check him out so what is real news sir tell us for the camera what is real news sir what they think about us this is incredible just like just like youtube is fake news is a personal opinion wow the hypocrisy is incredible he calls everyone who doesn't agree with his version of reality fake news when in fact his old channel is fake news we've seen it from observation of how our behavior is okay that's a personal opinion so would you like to see the supreme court decisions would you like to see the idea of what's legal and lawful as a person what's it passed on hold on hold on hold on one second hold on one second would you like to see the supreme court decision saying statutes policies and codes are not laws i have about 10 of them no great answer by the way seriously though you have 10 supreme court decisions that say statutes codes and policies are not law because you're not interested in the truth you're not into the lord land you're interested in this another paycheck right right yeah he just nodded he just nodded on camera he cares more about mammon than he does about universal law and the law of the land okay so so part of the part of the problem is that you guys walked past security and you didn't go through the proper screening so where's the water says we have so if you listen just listen to me sure we're listening sir if you don't if you don't abide by the security procedures of the building you can't enter the building and that's why we have a federal lawsuit in the in the united states district court that's great but the whole thing is that you have to go through the proper channels so if you have a federal lawsuit wait till the lawsuit gets well we still have another he can't do that because that would be the sensible thing to do he can't even shut up for two seconds for you to explain it to him no just carry on breaking the law that will really help your lawsuit another matter now that that was engaged as of a couple weeks ago from a separate incident so now we're here to attain the facts and the evidence from where we were told to go right so again policy procedure and code statute does not overwrite the law of the land it is for legal persons who identify as citizens i am not a citizen in the capacity right now i am a man what you are looking at the law of the land and universal law applies to men you swore a note to uphold the constitution not to uphold policy and procedure over the constitution so it's very simple they have rules in place that apply to people consent to the governed as per the declaration of independence i do not consent to be governed by people who think they have more rights and abilities than the individuals they serve you are a citizen of the united states just declaring you're not doesn't make it so there's a way to renounce citizenship in the united states and this isn't it and if you don't consent to be governed well it's tough okay so so that okay that right there that statement there there's there's laws that are put in place okay by who it's just by the citizens by the citizens so citizens make law legislation yes makes law legislation legislators actually no god makes law and legislators interpret the law to follow the policies and the procedures that are put in place can i have your name please sir you cannot open carry in the city and county of denver right because it's yeah because you yeah you'll be charged but then when we take you to federal court you'll have to explain how you've overthrowed united states law of the land within the right to carry a firearm but it has to be concealed and who and who made that law legislation does not make law for men and women they make policy and procedure for the citizens and listening to crap people have made up online doesn't make it so it just means you're dumb enough to believe anything anyone tells you in this city you will be charged you're carrying a firearm openly in the city you're carrying a firearm openly in the city so you have more rights and abilities than the men and women who pay for your job and who you serve the law requires police to open carry because it's part of their job it doesn't mean they have more rights than you in fact police lose some of the first amendment rights of a private citizen when they become a public employee because their interaction with the government is voluntary and mutually beneficial it's a perfectly logical question you have weapons you just said it's against the law so we're given certain rights we were given certain authorities i thought you were given duties obligations and responsibilities but according to your agent and agencies given rights tell me more why are we arguing you don't know what you're talking about sir of course because no sir if we could get together on personal time i could show you what i'm trying to talk about are you really that short on friends or something is that why you're always asking cops out to dinner there are websites for that kind of thing you know stop harassing cops doing their job my goal is to have the law upheld rather than policy procedures statutes and codes to enforce policy clearly because you just told us you can have weapons and we can't when we're the men and women protected by the second amendment you open carrying the city county number the second amendment doesn't say open carry concealed carry it says a right to bear arms the same way you're bearing arms the supreme court justice antonio scalia in 2008 wrote that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and is subject to reasonable prohibitions and regulations and subsequently federal court rulings have upheld existing gun prohibitions and regulations i fill out the form now we're trespassing on public property that's interesting did the owner tell us to leave of course not the owners the men and women who pay for the property thank you sir thank you sir trespassing means you were asked to leave by the owner of the building could you stop talking sorry notice how he just rudely and loudly inserts himself into other people's conversations the city and county of denver is a what not a who sir it's a walk not a who you're saying well where's the city and county of denver i want them to come here and ask me to leave are they going to ask me to leave that's what we're here for oh so you're here representing the city and county of denver okay well the city and county is a what it's paid for by who the who would be me and me right right but you're in public service capacity you've lost your rights for duties and obligations so in one breath he asserts that the cops have more rights than him but in his next breath he tells them they don't make up your mind because you sound like a massive hypocrite yes you need to read the regulations i'll prove it to you with the supreme court decisions that you refuse to look at maybe you'll find it on msnbc or fox news sir since youtube is fake news whatever makes you money right sure whatever well no you're here making money upholding policy over the law i'm here upholding the law over policy you don't even know me sir so you've made a preconceived uh determination about who i am because you're biased sir and your bias towards the cop because he's wearing a badge and doesn't believe any of your outlandish claims you've made lots of assumptions about him too even though you don't know him and why do you keep bringing up supreme court decisions when they supposedly don't apply to you because you you sound like your educated man you might i educated maybe the only place this idiot has studied the lore is on youtube i know what filibuster means sir it's not it's not applicable to this interaction this is not a political interaction sir this is not a debate you're incorrect he didn't say it was applicable to this situation he said you would be good at it there you go again you don't listen to what people say this is not a debate you're incorrect i have the laws the case law the supreme court decisions i even have your code on file as far as what it says and what it determines you have not read it because you don't care as you said you're not interested in hearing the supreme court decisions no you're not interested in upholding the law of the land sir you're interested in upholding policy for a check you're interested in upholding policy code and procedure for a check no he's just not interested in your interpretation of the law you're like used like you projected on to me you're just here for the money sir you're just here for the money sir well i need to have the facts for you to know the law that's interesting well would you like to give me your information and i will send you the facts no answer now you see we we pretend to feign like we care but really as long as they're cutting your check and you feel like you're not accountable you don't care listen would you like the facts you asked for the facts would you like him i want him right here right now right here right now so if you carry it with you well i guess it was my mistake this time they're not carrying with you but maybe you're right sir maybe going forward i should be more prepared so that i can give you exactly what you need to learn to learn your job that you don't seem to know how to do so you're right i should be more prepared to educate and train men and women who acting as officers who don't know their job you're absolutely correct sir can you imagine him chasing cops around shouting please listen to me please read my nonsense downloaded from a scam website yeah it typically happens [Music] so they're going to present that when they get there so they might not even have so everybody's guilty to prove an innocent right i can't but i can't speak for anybody else we're not guilty to approve an innocent sir i usually have a firearm you can exercise your rights by giving up your rights that's what he says now you're putting words in his mouth and interpreting those words to mean something else the supreme court has already ruled on this type of case you keep referring to supreme court cases so assume you're on board with accepting them as law or is it until they don't agree with your skewed interpretations so okay so when you when you enter the people's house okay so when you go and you get on a plane a plane is a private commercial airline sir it's a commercial airline sir the airport it's not an applicable it's not it's still an overthrow of constitutional law if you want to be honest because the public service accommodation does not have a right to overthrow law for policy and procedure this is all supreme court rules so i don't mean to elevate my voice it's not against the constitution for a private business like an airport to implement security procedures for safety wow did i just say that out loud do you and the way that you understand them is important that you don't do it in a place like this no no the supreme court is being challenged here by everyone here we're upholding the supreme court decisions everyone here is challenging them by not following them you don't challenge it by not following it that's breaking the law that's why the constitution is codified do you understand how this is going to get challenged right i don't know what that means sir so the way that this is going to get challenged is that you guys are going to get arrested and then it's going to have to go back that's the way it always happens sir is that something that you guys want to go through no it's not something we want to go through it's something you all want to continue to uphold when i have all the evidence facts and case law and the federal lawsuit to show that you guys are out of bounds if you have all the evidence and facts on your side and your lawsuit is filed then why do you feel the need to get yourself arrested do you just enjoy being in handcuffs or something it's real easy it's nice it is i'm giving up my rights no it's not do you want to give up your right to go through screenings you're a man right underneath the uniform you're a man right how was going do you want to give up your rights how was going through a building screen and giving up it's a search and seizure sir it's a form of search sir you're searching for weapons you really don't like the word unreasonable being in the fourth amendment do we paul it's lawful to have weapons sir we all have a right to bear arms sir you're trying to override procedures you have the right to bear arms but if it's posted on a building you cannot bear arms in a private in a private building this is not a private building you can bear arms in walmart sir because walmart is accessible to the public even though it's a privately owned business it's publicly accessible their policy their policy cannot overwrite the law of the land sir they're subject to federal lawsuit walmart may allow guns but i don't believe they allow open carry i'm not sure about that but private business owners have a right to control their property which includes a right to prohibit their customers from carrying firearms into their buildings if it's posted on the building you cannot you can't come in my house with a gun if i tell you your house is private property sir it's not public no it's not it's privately owned it's a public accommodation under the ucc sir this is another misunderstanding that the majority of people have i've arrested people before i'm sure you have because you and it went through it didn't go to the supreme court because they didn't take it there because they didn't take it there sure the majority of people don't have an understanding of the difference between policy statutes and codes and the law of the land which is codified in the constitution and upheld by the federal courts these are municipal courts they're dictatory they're advisory based on the consent of the government and i appreciate you having this dialogue because it shows that you care and you are a real man unlike some other individuals we have here this cop has really triggered him because he won't buy into his sovereign citizen bs that's really funny we do have the constitution and that gives us that gives us gives us a broad spectrum sure and everything is pursuant to that right wait no wait states have the right to govern themselves yeah do you want the federal government to control absolutely everything that you do no and i also don't want state governments either well we don't care about how you feel we only care about the law right the states they're not going against federal law they're being more stringent okay it's gone again no no it's not no it's not no it's not sure it's very simple very simple so like denver denver denver used to say that you can't carry a firearm in your vehicle that's loaded right that got challenged in the courts you have the right to protect yourself right they didn't overturn they didn't overturn that you can open carry in denver just because they didn't overturn it does not mean it's lost sir this is all people's beliefs this is beliefs none of it is legitimate sir then why challenge it if it's not law see how stupid your argument is no that's actually a law that's that's i can charge you criminally for power it's unlawful carry so i can actually charge you criminal no it's not because you have to lawfully go get a ccw that's your right you can carry a gun you have it right we're not telling you so you're legislating right you're telling me i have to pay for my right you have to go yeah it's called commercial but that's that's an agreement w2w9 is a contract sir men and women do not have to pay taxes the first page of the the first page of the code says the taxation is voluntary sir you have to pay you have to pay to possess an automatic weapon it's the same thing do you have to pay to possess weapons to possess an automatic weapon yes i have to pay for it because you're an agent and agency and all statues policies and codes only apply to agent agencies this is another sovereign citizen myth that statutes and codes only apply to government agents this has been shot down in court so many times if it's owned by the department yes if it's owned personally no you have to pay for it sir it's private property anything we own that's proper to us is private property and legislating it that's been passed through this this is the city uh county it's through the legislature it actually is a lot i can charge you criminally foreign rights come from god sir they come from legislation no they don't sir it says in the constitution what does it say in the bible i'm not quoting the bible for where i get my laws however the bible does say trust in the system however don't sell your sword trust in the system however don't sell your sword that sounds like something made up i read the bible as a kid and did a curse to research for that particular quote and all i came up with was memes on twitter so it looks like he's happy to drag the bible through the mud along with the constitution but you're telling me right now that it says in sir i'm a man i have a right to defend myself with whatever means i believe to be necessary until you have reason to believe that i'm in a commission of a crime i'm guilty until proven innocent don't tell me the bible says that i don't need the bible to say that my common sense and my conscience my god and that that you're god bible's not the word of god that's your interpretation well the cop didn't bring up the bible you did well it was a quote you pulled out of your ass you claimed he's in the bible but still you were the one who brought it up that's what he brought up i don't even know why you came over here sir we had a good conversation with this man right now right you have rights right but when you're in the uniform you have more rights and abilities than the man you serve that's the he says yes he says yes he's so sick he says we have less less well you have duties obligations and responsibilities and you're trying to project yours onto us we don't have rights projection refers to unconsciously taking unwanted emotions or traits you don't like about yourself and attributing them to someone else who does that sound like in this video sure but one comes first and the other comes second you're putting the cart before the horse sir freedom from search and caesar fourth amendment are you upholding that here today no you're as bad as a flat earther for cherry picking you continue to omit the word unreasonable from unreasonable search and seizure or change it to the word unlawful it's because you know it debunks your whole argument why else would you do it because it's relevant to the point you're trying to make no no no no you want us to be searched to access the people's courthouse which is which is it's a right to bear arms so it doesn't say again again you refuse you're indoctrinated you're indoctrinated and you're brought into the culture indoctrination the process of repeating an idea or belief to someone until they accept it without criticism or question who does that sound like sure like i said like i said you have municipal revised statute which is written by men week to week i have hundreds of euros supreme court decisions that are current up until 1960. you're not interested in the truth you know someone is overcompensating when they tell you they have hundreds of supreme court decisions up to the 1960s to back them up these cases are lawful when he thinks it's suits but unlawful when they plus i'm going to don't up another thing about this woman right here how she's trespassing upon my rights well you may as well get all these uh individuals names because they're saying right now on record no they haven't but they're saying on record we need to get their dereliction of duty in line because they're saying policy overrides the law of the land that's an issue did you get his name the law of the land is freedom from search and seizure to access the people's property this is the constitution sir the thing you swore to uphold the fourth amendment sir so don't say the constitution don't say the law of the land the constitution is the law of the land sir constitution the constitution and declaration of independence are the law of this land that are backed by the supreme court they uphold god's laws i didn't ask you for what you observed sir you already gave me an attitude and ego this man has been respectful honest open to you i don't need you to explain to me anything you're explaining is enough sir i don't need you to explain to me you're talking down to me i can combine whatever i want because i'm a man i'm fluid and dynamic i'm not bound by the words of other men in this realm sir it's funny how these free men and sovereign citizens who aren't bound by other men are constantly getting cuffed and hauled off to jail by the police because they think they know the law better than cops lawyers or judges you're not my god sir you want to be you desperately want to use your firearms and backup to dictate what i will do and won't do based on what other men wrote down i don't follow the dictates of other men and women in this realm so i have a conscience connected to the most high then why are you whining about hundreds of supreme court cases which have all been written by man if you don't follow the laws of man then stop citing them that's been a hypocrite nothing of value to say sir i could look at you and read you until you have nothing of value to say sir all i'm doing is mumbling and you're ignoring everything i'm saying because your heart is pumping but you cannot okay i think we're done here sir i appreciate you i appreciate you sir uh i appreciate you we know our rights that's it our rights are not going to be in french we have to put the opponent in the cage okay so then we're going to hold the people that and then you're going to give us your house in both then you're going to give us your house and boat that's the bottom line how to win friends and influence a cop into letting you into the courthouse without being searched tell him you're going to steal his house and bought why specifically he's bought is that a maritime law of the sea thing do you think he means he's vettel like car you think you could do whatever you want to do you're not interested in the regulations no no i'm threatening any man any man not you not you sir you're gonna take my house any man or woman who interferes with our rights i will take their house and vote my house i i didn't say you you have not interfered my rights here you come take my house sir please back away from me i'm not talking about you personally i didn't threaten you sir i said in the court of law in the court of law in the court of law listen well you're saying in a court of law now you didn't tell him that to begin with maybe just don't blurt out that you're going to steal someone's house and bought vessel in the future people can get very territorial over their home but maybe that's why you say it to trigger a response but that puts you well and truly in scumbag territory in my opinion and anyway i thought courts are unlawful i guess they are until that court case is going to benefit you somehow i come back here tomorrow government's going to take everybody's house and vote soon puts me in a cage i will hold that person personally liable as a man in court well i'm going to i'm advising you right now and there's no qualified immunity there either i'm telling you what's going to happen if i'm advising and if you follow those directives we're going to take you to federal court into as an individual man not as an agent or agency you will be held liable for interference or rights no i'm not violating your rights i'm telling you you're more than welcome to come and update the documents yeah because you're our god and our rights come from you and you're going to dictate with weapons what we do and this man is going to shake his head because policy and procedure overwrites law and we're the idiots here we're the idiots yes yes you are an idiot that's one thing you've got right and it's the only thing you've got right in this whole video it's because the corporate entities in this country are overriding law and everybody's being subject to stop stop i'm sure i'm sure you don't want to hear every time he goes to interact he turns away and walks away because he can't handle the truth you are barking at him and you're barking in circles like a dog chases his tail the difference here is the dog eventually gets bored or they realize they're chasing their own tale so what's your excuse he gave me ego sir i would talk to you if you were respectful to me okay sure no problem i apologize because no you have to understand sir this is not personal to me and you i've dealt with this for months and months i've been putting a cage over and over again for trying to uphold my rights i have the case while i have the supreme court i'm tired of it it's got nothing to do with you i'm tired of guys with ego and attitude who think that their booklets override my god given free choice and rights you're tired of it no so so you're thinking that the laws of behavior have in place because we have a fourth amendment freedom from search and seizure trying to search me to enter the people's courthouse as a violation of my rights trying to overthrow the law of the land for policy and procedure why do you think these security measures i'm not asking why they're in place see this is the jump everyone does your feelings don't matter to me i have a right to bear arms i have a right to freedom from search and seizure just because everyone's scared and wants to make everyone guilty to prove an innocent does not overthrow my rights but your rights aren't absolute government has the power whether you like it or not to limit an individual's freedom under certain circumstances like for security and safety you can't cherry-pick the constitution to suit your own needs i know there's a reason and having security sure but the fine line is our rights when you cross that fine line you're wrong that's why they're called rights because when you cross them you're wrong so listen when somebody gets arrested and then they get searched are you violating their rights if they're if they're engaged in a crime which is defined by lost injury harm taking place or a breach of a contract absolutely not who defined the law like that because surely it's written down like that somewhere no so you're just pulling this out of your ass what so if you're trespassing aren't you breaking the wall no the owner never asked me to leave here and i'm not trespassing i'm refusing i'm refusing to be subjected to you're here because they have a belief that policies procedures codes rules is it a law violation if the owner asks you to leave and you refuse to leave the owner of this building never asked me to leave well i think you're just about to be asked to leave but you'll be wearing a nice pair of silver bracelets to help you along you're fine it's the ones you're used to wearing i hope they fit the individual who's in legal control asked me to leave and that's you're under arrest put your hands behind your back and what's that for sure put your hands on your back appreciate you cooperating do you have any weapons on you that i don't know about okay you understand what we're doing here today i do not but i'm willing to talk to you okay do you want me to put your phone in here you're recording yeah i'll just keep it on in your pocket okay okay let's pat him down check to see if he has a weapon so now are you the the man who's yes but right now it's not looking good for you okay sure that's your that's your opinion again i mean i'm here upholding the law sure right i have a federal uh case in the united states right now we'll see what happens thank you so much for watching please like share and subscribe if you enjoy watching this kind of video you can now get early access to all my videos by supporting me over on patreon if that's your thing anyway i will see you in the next video and take care you
Cancel
Save Changes