Out of the car, I'm running through some basic tests. What's that? >> Because I have vertigo. >> Okay, that's fine. We can take all that into account. I'm still going to get you out of the car. I want to separate you from the car at this point. >> I won't. >> Ma'am, I'm asking you to step out of the car. >> And I'm telling you that I won't. >> I'm telling you to get out of the car. >> And I'm telling you >> So so here's what's going to happen. You're required to get out of the car. If you don't want to do the test, we'll deal with that. But I'm telling you to get out of the car. You have to get out of the car. >> Driver Tammy Lynn Gurk Jones promptly cites her medical vertigo while attempting roadside legal debate from behind closed car doors. Unimpressed officers quote established Supreme Court precedent transforming a standard traffic stop into an immediate confrontation between constitutional claims and inevitable physical custody. >> I don't have to get out of the car. I know my rights. My my father Okay, go ahead. >> You're wearing a badge around your neck. You're saying that that's from your father. >> Yep. >> Okay. This case law that tells me that you can get out of the car. It's Pennsylvania versus Mimms. So for any reason, I can get you out of the car. At this point, I'm asking you to get out of the car. >> I'm not getting out. >> Okay, then you're going to get arrested for obstruction. >> You're Get out of my car. That's easy >> Step out of the car. >> No, I know my rights. >> Brandishing her father's police badge around her neck ultimately fails to derail lawful procedures. As officers surround the vehicle with drawn flashlights, Tammy insists they have no jurisdiction over her private property unaware that obstinate roadside lectures rarely override criminal obstruction charges.