Transcript Details
Back to Video Edit
Language
en
Format
text
Source
scrappa
Auto-generated
Yes
Confidence
N/A
Created
2026-10-22 20:06
Transcript Content
officer of the law, the speed limit states that it's 65. So, you are not allowed to go past that speed limit, period. What makes you think that just because you're an officer that you can go >> license, please? >> What did I do wrong? >> I would like to identify >> I don't have to. I've not committed a crime. What was my crime? Please tell me the charge that I committed. >> Car 214, can you come to my 20? >> Please tell me the crime that I committed. >> I wanted to have a proper conversation with you to let you know that I can't catch people that are doing 80. >> Where does it state in the law that you're allowed to go over the speed limit unless it's an emergency? Please tell me the NRS code that states that or the DMV code and traffic laws that state that you can do that. No, please state that to me. I am invoking my Fifth Amendment right. Do you know what my Fifth Amendment right is? >> No, I don't. Tell me. >> You're an officer of the law. Fifth Amendment right states that when I invoke that, whatever charge or crime you're committing me of, you have to go ahead and state that and show it to me therein. So, please tell me the NRS code that states that you're allowed to go faster than 65 unless it is an emergency. >> I'm trying to enforce public safety because my radar was flashing 75, 78, 79. So, somebody up there is speeding. And nine times out of 10, when they're speeding, they're making unsafe lane changes, >> Right. >> You were way behind me, man. I saw you long ago and you came really quick up along me and took my faster. >> Maybe because you were doing My cruise control said it 70. >> Ma'am, I have a breathalyzer. It records everything. So, it records my speed. I stay at 65. I use my cruise control. >> So, I'm glad that you do your speed limit and all that, but I'm just trying to let you know that my radar is flashing 78. >> So, again, you ask tell me, please >> Can you get me from 147? >> Please tell me what crime I committed or what you're charging me with or anything. >> me your identification. >> So, then I do not have to give you my ID or identify myself because I've not committed a crime. No, I don't. No, I do not. I've not committed a crime and I'm not under arrest. It states it in the law. It's my constitutional right. >> if I ask you? First off, I just wanted to have a conversation with you letting you know, instead of having a conversation at 65 mile an hour, but my radar was flashing. I was trying to catch somebody up there, right? That's my God-given right to protect the safety of the community. When somebody's doing 80 up there, they're normally zigzagging out of traffic. That makes it unsafe for a 92-year-old grandma, and I don't like that because my mother drives these roads. And if I can't get around you because there was a silver vehicle over here in front of me in the HOV lane. >> Because they were going the speed limit? >> Perhaps, right, but so >> So if someone was going 70 and your radar was going off, they obviously would have went past me and you would have been able to see that, but you were behind me for quite a bit. So please explain to me how it is that if your radar went off past 70 and no one's passing me that you detected that. I'm not just >> detected my radar detected >> That Okay, fine. Your equipment, your radar device detected it. >> Am I on paper? As far as what? For parole or probation? I do not have to identify myself. I've not committed a crime. >> I don't think you have any fourth amendment rights up here on paper. >> I don't have to disclose anything, and if you really want to go down that road, no, I'm not on probation or parole. Just satisfy your need to go ahead and pry information from me. I have the right to drive on public roadways in the US without any infringement upon me. >> Yeah, this is this is I just wanted to have a conversation with you. >> And I'm just letting you know that you're an officer of the law and you're supposed to uphold it. So you shouldn't be speeding or tailgating. If I tailgated you, you would have pulled me over immediately. >> But you have no idea what I was doing. >> If you really had an emergency, the second you got around me, you would have took off to go get that person, but you didn't. >> No, because I felt like I I owed you an explanation. >> What's more important? Giving me an explanation or protecting the roads and safety as you're so stating you're trying to uphold? >> And by the way, Van Allen. >> That's fine. >> P number is 483 for the record. >> No, that's fine. >> I'm just waiting on Sergeant. >> No, that's fine. The sergeant can come out. Not a problem. >> So he can give you a further >> Further education, ma'am. I've been researching law and all the rights that I have, and the thing is is that officers don't like it when people know the law. >> This is the tragedy because I just wanted to give you an explanation rather than to do it at 65 mile an hour. >> That That was your choice to do it. >> And and you're not even receptive. >> The fact is that you're pulling me over to have a conversation, and now you're having your sergeant come out because I won't identify myself for your safety. But obviously, if you had a for your safety, you would be either holding me at gunpoint or you wouldn't have approached my window. You would have backed up and went to your vehicle by now and waited for your supervisor if you were really that concerned for your safety. So, explain to me how it is that you're still concerned for your safety if you're still standing here having a conversation with me and I'm being very eloquent. I'm not cursing, not being rude. I'm just stating my rights. >> I'm all for that and that's the tragedy because you're not even receptive to a conversation. >> Because of the fact that I tried to state to you that you don't have the right to speed. I I'm tired of seeing these officers go speeding and then someone goes and does the same speed as them and then they get pulled over. That's entrapment. That's not right. You're supposed to uphold the law. You took an oath. You're supposed to know the law on top of that. So, when I ask for what NRS code or violation that I went ahead and committed or infraction, you're supposed to as an officer of the law state that. That's supposed to be your knowledge. You're supposed to know it and the fact that you can't give me one is very concerning. >> Hey, how you doing today? >> I've been better. A little bit uh upset at the fact that your officer stating the claims she's stating. It's very unprofessional and upsetting that an officer of the law can't give me the NRS code that apparently I'm violating, but then she tells me I have not committed a crime or a charge. So, I do not have to identify myself and if she really felt that concern for her safety, she would have stepped away from my window. She would have backed up and waited until you, her supervisor, came to assess the situation. Obviously, she's still standing here having a full conversation with me for 8 minutes. She obviously does not have a concern for her safety. She just wants to do a papers check because I know when you run the ID, it goes into the database and it shows that I had an interaction with law enforcement and I'm not having that on my record. So, I do not have to declare my identity because I have not committed a crime. I'm not under arrest. >> Okay. You're not under arrest at the moment, but you were detained. >> She never stated that, officer. >> All right. Anytime an emergency vehicle stops you, you are detained. Just so you know. All right. You may not be under arrest, but you are detained at that moment. >> But I still do not have to present my ID. I still do not have to present my ID. >> Technically by law, you don't have to present your ID. >> Thank you for stating that. >> But by law, you do have to provide your name. >> No, that's providing an My That's giving it. >> I'm not going to argue with you. After speaking with her, you're free to go at the moment. >> Okay. >> But for future reference, you do have to state your name. >> Okay. And for future reference, you need to advise your officer that just because she's a law enforcement official, if I had tailgated her the way she tailgated me, you guys would have pulled me over in a heartbeat. >> I'm not going to argue. I wasn't there. I didn't see that. After speaking with her, you're free to >> Can I have your badge number, please? >> Uh 214. >> I'll be making a formal complaint since you do not want to go ahead and reprimand your officer for the fact that she was driving unsafely. >> What I do with my officers is a personal matter, which is not public record. Just so you know. >> Like I said, I will go to your superiors. But thank you. I know I'm free to go. I'm just stating for the record that I will be making a formal complaint because you refused to go ahead and let your officer know that she does not have the authority to tailgate or to speed unless it is an emergency. >> I'm not going to debate any of that with >> That's fine. I'll go on my merry way. You have a nice day, officer. >> Use the shoulder here to get up to speed. Merge over one lane. Just be careful. >> Yep. >> The officer was speeding and the man called her attention. But her reply was she needs to identify the man. Whereas the man refused me because definitely there was no emergency and she was going way over the speed limit. And when as far as it came, he also tried to get his ID. But at the end of the day, when they noticed this, they were not getting his ID, they actually just let him go on. He definitely so went ahead and sued them.
Danger Zone

This action cannot be undone. Please be certain.