My attorney then asked him, "Have you ever made any fake Facebook pages?" He created a fake social media, specifically a Facebook page. Follow her. About a year ago, I posted a video showing Corporal Charles Mills with the Cherokee County, Georgia Sheriff's Office, barging into Natasha Lopez's home without a warrant. Can you get uh Joseph Christopher Helms for me, please? Yeah. Is he under arrest? Yes, ma'am. Okay. What are you charging him with? a lot of things like well on the warrant right now is speeding and eluding we didn't have to make this so complicated I feel like public enemy number one right now usually people are a little more friendly but it's all right if you continue to have a warrant you're going to be placed under warrant right now I need everyone out of this house right now yes ma'am um 921 for what obstruction You're hindering my You're hindering I feel like they all failed me. They all have messed up in some way. As I detailed in that first video, the department then basically gaslit the public claiming to essentially know nothing about the Constitution. Unbelievably, the charges are still to this day pending. I've been following this one closely, and a couple of weeks ago, I interviewed Natasha's lawyers who were fighting those charges and preparing to file a civil rights lawsuit. If standing on your own porch and in your own home and demanding a warrant is a crime, there is no Fourth Amendment. Period. But now, in just the past few days, something has been revealed about Corporal Mills that has now finally resulted in him being fired. And shockingly, it actually has nothing to do with the constitutional violations that we all watched in the first video. I've had to create fake pages to see her content because she blocks me. As you may have noticed, me and my family members keep getting injured in random ways every couple of weeks or so. Before it was my son and then it was me and then a couple of weeks ago my daughter injured her elbow. So, we're always having to get somebody to the doctor and fast. But it's not always easy to find the right doctor who just happens to be covered in our health plan. That's the beauty of Zachdoc, today's video sponsor. They have more than 150,000 providers within 200 plus specialties across all 50 states. It's always super easy. Zdoc's website does it all for you. It has tons of reviews from real patients and detailed doctor profiles to help you choose the right ones. You can instantly see actual appointment openings and just click to instantly book a visit and they happen fast, usually within 24 to 72 hours. Sometimes you can even get sameday visits like we did for my daughter's elbow. This is completely free to use. Taking care of your health doesn't have to be difficult. Head to zdock.com/ivil rights lawyer to find and instantly book a top rated doctor today. Thanks so much to Zoddoc for sponsoring today's video and helping us all take better care of our health. Now, let's get back into it. On November 2nd of last year, I show you what happened to Natasha Lopez. After returning home from a trampoline park with her kids, she was confronted by Corporal Charles Mills of the Cherokee County Sheriff's Office, who had been waiting for her to get home. He was looking for her adult son, who did not live at her residence. He was suspected of driving a motorcycle that Mills had seen the day before. The reason that Mills knew the son was at Natasha's house is because he loves flock cameras and he had been basically stalking her son's girlfriend using it. We now know that Mills looked up the son's girlfriend on Flock at least 18 times, even though she wasn't suspected at that time of having committed any crime. Apparently, even at this point, Mills had a propensity to stalk women using electronic devices. And we will come back to that. Mills ended up arresting the adult son and really there was no problem. Natasha was standing on her front porch when all of a sudden Mills walks towards her demanding that everyone come out of the house that he was clearing the house. He had a warrant for my kid and my he came right out. And I said, "Well, you're have to get a warrant if you want anything else and I'm going to have to ask you to leave." And he that's when he got mad. Yep. Officer. All right. I got warrants for you. Okay. Where's your phone at? Not on me. I didn't have a phone today. You didn't have a phone today? No. Do you have a cell phone? Nope. You don't? I mean, you gave me a cell phone number. Ask answered any more questions. He's pleading the fifth. Wants an attorney. That's fine. Tell him Chris in the fifth. 182. I'm 105. Hey, come here. Do you have a warp? Why are you like in my house? my garage. I'm not. Do you have anything in your pocket? Okay. Well, Chris is right here. Okay. Is this like an apron? You want to leave that here? Can you take the ring off and give it to someone? You have to twist it. Yeah. You have like a watch or anything, Chris. Take that off, too. No, I don't. Give it to She's giving you my ring. Now bring him. Y'all stay right here for a second. Okay. Yep. All right. Here's what's going to happen next. You're going to sit here and write a search warrant to seize your cell phone out of that residence. So, if uh you want to speed things along and give me your cell phone, I have a cell phone. As I was like standing on the porch, I heard him start to question my kid again. Like as he's up at the at the car putting him in there, start asking him questions about a cell phone. I told him I spoke up and I was like, he why are you questioning him? He just told you that he wants a lawyer. I need everyone out of the house, please. No. Show me a warrant. I'm securing the house. Show me a warrant again. Show me a warrant. At this point, the house is being secured. Show me a warrant for a search warrant. Show me a warrant. Cuz I believe that there's concert band evidence of my crime inside this house. And still at this time, I'm thinking he he thinks the motorcycle's in my garage, you know. So, I was like, he needs to do the work, get the warrant, and then he's going to be disappointed cuz there's not a motorcycle in my garage, you know. Show me a warrant. So, I need this house cleared. I'll clear it myself. No, you won't. I'll call the police on you. Yeah, I have gone clear. Come on out of the house. Everyone's detained. Come on. Do you have a warrant? Do you have a warrant? This is being videotaped. I hope you know that. At this point, do you have a warrant? I'm going to call the police. I don't care. I'm going to call the cops. Everyone outside now. What's your name and your badge number? If you continue to obstruct kids, I'm not obstructing you. I have small kids and dogs. If you continue to obstruct right now, I need everyone out of this house right now. Yes, ma'am. Um 92 get over for what? Obstruction. You're hindering my You're hindering. You're hindering my investigation. Again, everyone is detained. I called the police to confirm if you had a warrant and you're arresting me. Relax. Everyone is detained. Put it on social media. And he like pulled my arms up to like I had to go up on my tip toes and turn like he pulled I'm like 5'3 and he's super tall and he I felt like he was like intentionally like he was pulling my arms up to my shoulder blades. Natasha's dog and children were inside the house and she didn't want Corporal Mills in her house. Put it on social media. Take your brother. Take your brother. Please go. It's okay. It's okay. Get my Here's my phone. Anyone else in the house? Yes, it's I want my phone. Stop. We need No. Give me my phone. Oh my god. Please give him my phone. Sheriff's office. Come on outside. No. I want to talk. Answer it. 911. He walks around inside my house. He makes every all the kids get out. So, it was only my children and then my son's girlfriend that were in the home. And you can see it like in the video. They were all like standing right there in the same area like wondering what's going on. But they knew I didn't want them to come outside cuz I don't want them to be like and they didn't want to be like I'm sure you saw that my 9-year-old that night has literally changed him. What they did to him traumatized him to his absolute core. Do officers need warrants to come into my home? Mama, I love you. Have you guys are insane in front of these kids? What's your badge number? 752. Thank you. Out of the house. Get up. What's your badge number? 885. Thank you. Your sergeant stay on the porch here. What are we doing? The house is right now. I want to know if he needs a warrant to come into my home. Can you put her in a car? No. Why are you asking why I ask questions? Why do you treat people that way? He did not have a warrant, but he didn't care. As I explained in the first video, this was done in clear violation of one of the most basic constitutional rights that we have, the right to be secure from law enforcement entering and searching our homes without a search warrant. Mills also committed another constitutional violation when he arrested Natasha from within the threshold of her home without an arrest warrant. Out of all the videos I've done, this one is probably the one that I get asked about the most about an update. So many people want to know what ended up happening. The problem is in the past year, there hasn't been all that much to update you about. Believe it or not, the misdemeanor criminal charges against Natasha are still pending a year later. No judge has yet even addressed the constitutional violations in her case. A couple of weeks ago, I got the chance to talk to Natasha's lawyers about the status. This includes her defense attorney, Chris McCormack, as well as her civil rights lawyer, a guy you already know well from my videos, Solomon Rner. And Chris, she she was arrested before they had a warrant. Is that right? Yeah, absolutely. She was arrested before they had an arrest warrant, much less a search warrant for her property. So, she's in her house. They order her out. They order her off the porch. She says, "No, do you have a warrant?" And for that action, for those words, she's now facing criminal prosecution and facing jail time. So, this happened, the original incident where the cops came into Natasha's house, that was in August of 2025. Is that right? Correct. And then I had did my original video on what happened and I interviewed Natasha November, I think it was November 25th of 2025. Was she charged after that? after my video came out, she was obviously arrested in August. And so the way the way the system works is when you're charged, you have essentially you have a pending case. And so you're not formally charged by the prosecutor's office until they file what's called an accusation. And so the way it works in Georgia is if you're charged with a misdemeanor, which is obstruction is a misdemeanor. All all that simply means is the maximum punishment for each count is 12 months in jail and $1,000 fine. That's assigned to the solicitor's office. And so in Georgia, you're formally charged by entry of an accusation. All that means is a prosecutor, either the solicitor himself, which is my understanding the solicitor himself, drafted these accusations and filed them in May, by the way. May is when they were filed. What is Natasha charged with? Obstruction of justice. Two counts of obstruction of justice. One for essentially not leaving her own front porch when commanded, and then the second count is not leaving her house when commanded. I've never been arrested. I've never been in trouble. So, I didn't, you know, I got in the car and then that about that time a lot of officers started showing up and I could see them, but none of them had came to the car and I was like, I wanted I I remember saying that I wanted a a sergeant or a boss or somebody that wasn't this this guy that was breaking into my house. All right, I'm getting a search warrant for the house to get his cell phone. Okay. Um, so I've secured the house. In the process of securing said house, mom was not letting me in the house. I gave her multiple opportunities to stop hindering my investigation. She refused. She's under arrest for obstruction. I already got an arrest warrant for my my offender. He's already in jail or in my car under arrest with said warrant. So now I just need to get a search warrant to find his phone in the house. So that's where we're at right now. The house is secured. There's no one else in there. I need to get a paper. Okay. No problem. So or I can print it remotely to a precinct and have one of our guys bring it to us. I'll probably do that. If you can hold see run a bridge they'll print a bridge and I'll just go grab it real quick. Perfect. Thank you. Cool. Hang out. Yep. Yeah. I'm going to type it right now. So, if you could just be at that printer whenever, uh, I'll let you know when it's printing. Okay. And then we'll go from there. Keeping eyes on mom back seat. Yeah. Yeah. And then I got the driver. Yeah. What up? Okay, this is Cherokee County Magistrate Judge Emory Lot on the record with Cherokee County Sheriff's Office Deputy Mills on search warrant e docket E01463 case number S so 2512319. Deputy, would you raise your right hand for me? Do you swear the statements and testimony you give in regards to this application affidavit and warrant are true to the best of your knowledge? Yes, your honor, I do. All right. Tell me first what it is that we're searching. Yes, sir. Right now, we are uh intending to search the residence located at here in Cherokee County. Right. All right. Are we searching the whole residence or are we doing Yes, sir. The uh inside of the residence uh what I'm looking for is a cellular phone belonging to Joseph Christopher Helms which uh has a phone number. Your honor, this stems from a fleeing case. The uh Mr. Helms fled on a previous date and um was arrested here subject to an arrest warrant. At the time of his arrest, he said he didn't have a cell phone, which was inaccurate. During an interview with him earlier in the day, he uh provided me with a cell phone number. So, I know it's inaccurate that he doesn't have one because he gave me a number for his cell phone. At the time of his arrest, I also noticed he had some uh phone numbers written with PIN on his arms. Um so, would indicate that he had already been in the cell phone and got the numbers he needed for Jill out of it to leave it at the house. The reason I'm after the cell phone judge is because I know that cell phones contain evidence which would be directly related to this uh fleeing case. Some of that evidence would include GPS data. um that's stored on the device which would show locations and times. Also, uh other material on the phone would also be evident in this case. Okay, sounds good. We're going to jump off here and uh grant this search warrant, get some signatures. And when they got the search warrant for the phone, they came back to the to the porch cuz they all detained all of my kids and stuff to the porch for like 30 40 minutes. Hang on. I'm trying to turn the light back off. I'm on the wrong button is the problem. body cameras in blatant violation of policy. In fact, internal affairs findings have already been clear that they violated policy when they kept muting their cameras. So, of course, that would be an important piece for cross-examination. This judge down there in this little county is actually strongly considering not allowing any cross-examination on that point, which is frankly constitutionally offensive. On one of the cameras, you can hear him telling the other officers that my son doesn't live there because they were under the impression that he lived there because they were like, "Where's his room?" And they were like, "No, this is his house is not here. This is his mom's house." And they were like, "What? Where does he stay when he's here? North Carolina." And he's living in that apartment with a girl. Okay. But this girl's house. No, this is mom's house. His mom. Yeah. I insisted that the prosecutor bring every officer who was in my client's house to to court so I could cross-examine each and every one of them. Specifically asked them why they turn their body cams off, which is a Brady violation in of itself, which in my view warrants a dismissal in and of itself. How can you be doing an active investigation and voluntarily and knowingly turn off your body cameras, every single one of them, and then with a straight face accuse my client of obstructing justice? So, they're obstructing their own protocols. Yet, my client is the only one getting charged. Who's in charge? That'd be me. Hi. How are you? Great. Ow. My hair. Thank you. I'll turn the hair on for you. My name's Natasha. I have a question. He put me in handcuffs because before he he went to barge into the house. I had two dogs and I have small kids. And when he went to barge into the house, I asked him did he need a warrant? And I called 911. I wasn't obstructing, wasn't doing anything. He would not answer my question on whether or not he needed a warrant to come into my home. And honestly, when you guys get the warrant and you go in there and you see that there's nothing in there and you can turn around, he can apologize to me because that was absolutely insane. All I did was ask that he need a warrant to come into my home. That's it. And I called 911 to verify it. He immediately snatched me up and put me in handcuffs. And I even asked I'm like, "Why do you guys treat people this way? Like, it's my home. Do I not have that right to ask that? No. Are you asking me? Yeah, I'm asking you. Do I not have the right to ask if you need a warrant to come into my home? Sure, but that's not my understanding of how things happen. It's videotaped. It certainly is. Yes. My all my I was videotap I have a camera on my front porch. He's got a body camera. And my son can Well, sir, you were there. Did I not ask? And did I not call 911? Sir, why do you treat people that way? Like, I don't understand that. You guys are so wrong for this. You didn't even buckle me up. My life doesn't matter either. What's your uh last name? I just need it for my home. I just need it for the booking paperwork so you can get out. They're clear about 20 minutes. Thank you. And I don't have a seat belt on her if you're not going to [ __ ] with me that you can wait until you get there tonight. They got the search warrant for the phone. So he knocks on the door and announces, you know, sheriff's office, search warrant, which I'm like, you already detained everybody and arrested me. Search warrant. I'm going to get the leashes. Said you think you saw it. So, it could be anywhere in this house. Yes. Yeah. There's this one here that I saw. Okay. We can search all the people that came out too, right? Uh, yeah. You said now it's going straight to voicemail. Is one of them out there holding it? That's really odd because it was ringing earlier. Hey, what's the possibility she took it with her to jail? Call and that just turned it off. Yeah, cuz that would make sense. She got to the jail. It starts ringing. The jail turns it off. Awesome. Why do you think the one upstairs isn't it? Cuz when I called it, it didn't ring. Oh, so it turned back on and you try to call it. Yeah. Oh, okay. Yeah. So like dope can be hidden in any tiny little compartment. You put me in a tough spot right now because like I came here, I said, "Here's a search warrant for a cell phone that belongs to him." You had it. Not only did you have it, you turned it off while I was calling it trying to find it. I think she's just scared, man. Yeah, she I But she hindered my execution, my search warrant, my investigation. I know. I'm hoping at this point we can just maybe at least cut her a break. You know, she did give me to you. She made a dumb decision. We got two people in jail right now. We're about to have three. I understand. I'm just out of handcuffs. Please. I'm hoping we can just anymore. Thank you. You're under arrest for obstruction. I gave you the I gave it to you. Well, we were going to find it eventually. And we were going to search. Oh, can I call my father? I tried calling him earlier. He wouldn't answer me. My father? Yeah. I want to go learn about your car. You want All right. So, I'm taking some of the female. Does this do anything else that might be beneficial for me? No, not that I know of. It's just me and him on here. Cool. Will you uh take me to the motorcycle? Yes. What are you going to do with it? Well, I want to see you. So, it's fine. You can see it. What are you going to do with it? Probably nothing, honestly. Okay. Document it. Yeah, probably about it. What are you going to do with him? He's going to pass my arrest. He's He's going to jail. That That warrant's already been issued and executed and he's under arrest. I can't undo any of that at this point. Still going to need a paper. That's fine. But do that once we get there. Yeah, cuz we won't be in a we won't be pressed for time, right? This might take us a little time, but you know, we're we're doing all the steps we have to do to make sure no one's rights are violated. We're not about that kind of business. So, but uh but again, I do appreciate all your cooperation right now. And um more you uh you just going to cider once we finish with all this? We'll see. I'm not going to take her to jail. I'm 218. probably the the right way to go. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, exciting. She's giving me like everything. Understand? Yeah. But yeah, we're on that lighter. All right. Solomon, how can how can it be a crime in the state of Georgia to demand that officers have a warrant before they enter your property or enter your home? It can't it can't be a crime anywhere in the United States because thankfully we have something called preeemption which means that the Constitution is the law of the land. If standing on your own porch and in your own home and demanding a warrant is a crime, there is no Fourth Amendment. Period. And frankly, the judge should see that and the judge should do the right thing here and throw the case out. Think about it this way. If if reckless driving gives the police enough to come into your home and seize all of your smartphones because of a driving infraction, not even your home, your parents' home, your friend's home, another home that you may have visited at some point. Now, the police get to go into that home, claim exent circumstances without a warrant, do a protective sweep as mills like to call it, and then take those devices. Again, there is no more Fourth Amendment. There has to be some sort of reasonableness standard here and this just does not pass constitutional muster at all. I think when we last talked, I think it was like a year ago, it was in early November of last year. Um, the first interview that I did with you got like four and a half million views almost. Did that surprise you at all? It did a little bit, but I think I have learned a lot over the last year and I can see why it concerns so many people. Tell me basically in your words what has happened since we last talked. I was able to file some complaints with the department for like body cam violations. There were numerous officers at my house that night who were turning off or muting their body cams. I was able to get those sustained, but there was no discipline on the officers. She explained that after we last talked, she had been very vocal on social media in her attempts at obtaining accountability for what Mills had done to her. Then in July of this year, this Facebook business page pops up that was called Not So Noble, which used her business logo and existed for the purpose, the sole purpose of attempting to shut her up, harass her family, and embarrass her. Back in July, I had noticed that there was a fake Facebook profile that started liking comments on my social media or you sending me messages. I had taken it upon myself to really start to be very transparent with what happened at my house that night on social media and some there were some individuals who did not like that. So, this fake page popped up. It was called Not So Noble. They were using like my my business logo some and they had made multiple pages like this because I would have them deleted but like so sometimes they would use even just my own personal pictures as like the profile pictures. The not so noble Facebook page created and distributed several AI images of Natasha in an attempt to make her look bad and even created fake only fans posts using real photos of Natasha in an attempt at embarrassing her and her kids in the community. I got the first few pages deleted and then the third page they created they created like a business page so it was more difficult to get it deleted through Meta and they started running ads off of it paid ads and what they were doing was pulling every single incident report or um anything that they could find screenshots from my social media or whatever it could be to harass my family like me and my children and they were posting them on this page. They got to the point where I was scared and upset for the kids. So, I filed a police report in July and I essentially begged them like even though I didn't want to call the department because I didn't feel like they were going to help me, I had no choice because it was getting to where strangers were coming to my social media and saying things like about my children and I was worried like for their safety, you know, like I don't know any of these people. So I begged them. You know, they have this real-time intelligence center and they're always bragging about the technology that they have. And so, you know, I was like, I need help. I need to find out like who the I can't even get a protection order against a against somebody I don't know who it is. They would not help me. They essentially said, you know, first amendment rights and and and dismissed me. So, I got on the phone with Meta and started working on trying to get these things deleted. And then next thing you know, they started posting explicit images of me. I don't know how they were real images of me. I'm not sure. They were taken probably 8 or 10 years ago. And I'm not sure how they retained them. I would just imagine because they made a hate page about me. Maybe somebody who just had had them and then dis disliked me maybe searched my name and ended up on that page. But they were using the photos to create like an AI generated only fans profile picture of me and then, you know, was posting that all over the internet. And I was able to get it deleted because of the type of content that it was pretty quick. But then they they started doing like a Google Drive link where they were linking all of these different like it would say like only fans proof and it would be all these different pictures and then all these subfolders of like all these different unredacted incident reports of like my children as minors and things like that. I mean they went as far back as like 2011. I went to Google and was able to get some of the images deleted but he just kept making them and he kept making these posts and he kept bashing me. At the time, you did not know who this was, who who was behind this. I didn't know who it was. I had a feeling that whoever it was maybe was working with somebody at the department just because of how rapidly and quickly they were able to like get all these documents, but I never thought that it would be like somebody that was inside the department. I actually thought it was like a bunch of people because when um they would like my post before I would block them, when I would look at the page, like the sheriff's sister was on there. There were a multitude of like different officers wives. So I had a feeling, you know, it was just like a a big group of them because I have caught a bunch of backlash from, you know, their their family members and things like that just going public with what happened. The Notso Noble page even went so far as to buy actually buy advertising from Meta in an attempt to more accurately distribute the harassment that they were doing to Natasha's local geographic area. I mean, this is crazy, right? Natasha tries to file a police report about what's happening, but of course, the cops did nothing at the time. She didn't know who was behind the Notso Noble Facebook page. She actually thought it was multiple people behind it just because there was so much of it. But at the motions hearing that happened the day after I talked with their lawyers, something came out and it was almost unintentional. So when we went to court, something told my attorney to ask him on the stand um are you pulling records on or have you ever pulled any records on my client? And I was shocked because he said yes. Have you done an open record request to see what Miss Noble has has tried to obtain? Yes, I have. Okay. Great. So, what have you found out from the open request? Like I've requested records of what of open records request what my client did? No, she doesn't put her name on hers. How do you know that? Cuz her requests always end up on the internet and they don't have any name under the request line. So what have you specifically requested an open record request? Like it literally says like open records requests filed between such and such dates or between these numbers. What have you received? Like a list of all the open records that have been requested. Okay. Do you have materials provided to you? Yeah. They send them to you on a little portal. My attorney then asked him, "Have you ever made any fake Facebook pages?" You can create a fake social media, specifically a Facebook page. follow her. I've had to create fake pages to see her content because she blocked me. He said, "Well, yes, because she blocked me and I need to be able to see her page when she's dragging my name through the mud." And I I still it still didn't register in my head that maybe he was responsible for, you know, that P. I just was like, "Wow, this guy's crazy." Cuz I've had him blocked since he arrested me. I've had them all blocked. So, you were obsessed with my client. I'm not obsessed at all, but I get screenshots like 24/7 of all of her latest content where she's constantly dragging my name through the mud. So, it's it's nice to not be blindsided by those whenever I you know, you consider yourself. Do you think that's within office protocol or policy? I don't think there's any policy against us being on Facebook and looking at things. Well, I mean, you can follow me as well. Not as much. No, you have, right? Not as much. I've seen your page. Have you ran me through your flock system? No. You like to use Flock, don't you? Flock is a very good investigative tool. Yeah. It was an all day hearing and it ended and then that was on a Friday and then Monday morning we woke up from to an email from the solicitor who is prosecuting me and said that he was disclosing that his staff had obtained some information I guess after our hearing that Corporal Mills was responsible for creating and operating the notso noble Facebook page. So after the hearing, an email gets sent by the prosecutors in Cherokee County to Chris McCormack, Natasha's lawyer. It says, "Good morning. Sometime after 5:00 p.m. last Friday following the conclusion of the motion hearing in the Lopez case, my staff unexpectedly became aware of a piece of information that in our judgment we are required to disclose to you. Corporal Charles A. Mills is the creator and owner of the Notso Noble Facebook page currently active on Facebook. That is the extent of the information that we learned and we have nothing else to share on the subject because that is all we know. And there it is. Remember that Natasha tried to file a police report and the cops wouldn't help her. Meanwhile, it's not only one of them behind the harassment, doxing, and stalking, whatever you want to call it. It's the actual officer who is simultaneously testifying in court under oath in her criminal case in an attempt to convict her. And I was in sh I was at the gym when I got that email and I ended up leaving cuz I mean I just was had a lot of emotions about it. Um I thought it was insane. Like it's scary of course because now you know it's like law enforcement and just the different access that they have to different things you know is kind of scary. But I immediately got in touch with my attorney and I filed an internal affairs and a criminal report again because I I texted the detective actually and sent him a screenshot and I said, "Is this why you wouldn't help me?" You know, be I'm like I feel like they knew, you know, like now I question everybody. Did the detective respond? He did and he he was like, "You could file another report and I'll take a look at it. I don't want to jump to conclusions based off of a screenshot." Which I thought was insulting. So I responded back and was like a screenshot. This is an email from the solicitor general saying that Corporal Mills was responsible for this patient that's been harassing me for the four months. That kind of changed his tone, but I just stopped dealing with him. I actually wrote up an entire criminal complaint. I emailed it to the GBI, to Post, to the sheriff, to the district attorney. I felt like they all failed me over the last, you know what I mean? Like over the last year, they all have messed up in some way. Immediately the district attorney filed a recusal. She recused herself from my son's case in superior court and is asking for um independent I guess counsel from the prosecuting committee for them to assign a special prosecutor to decide I guess like what to do with the case. We asked the solicitor general for the like how did your staff obtain that information and he will not tell us. He won't he won't even respond anymore. Even the judges here don't make them do anything. It's I feel like we keep going to these court hearings and just keep arguing and the judge like never he doesn't rule anything. Does that make sense? Like he doesn't he's like not a good mediator. after my first YouTube video where I interviewed you. While the charges are still pinning against you, the same guy who went into your house without a warrant and arrested you, he's out there on Facebook creating a fake profile or fake profiles that he's using to actively stalk you, harass you online, and to try to make you look bad, to try to embarrass you. Yes. He um was paying for two ads at one point in time. One was a ad on my my child, my 17-year-old. He had gotten hurt in July. He got hit by some fireworks. So, he took pictures off of my social media of my son and was essentially bashing him and was pushing it out through an ad ser like on Meta to try to get it to go like more local. And then the other ad was my next door neighbor was selling their home. So, it was an ad on that like a a buyer beware type thing like to not but like giving out our like all of this was like totally unredact. Look, I've pulled records from this department on certain officers since this happened to me and I can tell you right now if a juvenile is involved I'm paying a lot of money for a lot of black boxes. Okay? I don't know their names, their address and as well I should you know all of these records that he obtained. I don't know if he pulled them himself or if somebody in the department was doing it for him, but they're not redacted. Their names, their birthdays. I mean, there's there's school police records from like when one of my kids was seven over like a pencil or like it it's just it was it was really bad. It was really bad. He he wanted to shut me up is what he was trying to scare me and he was attacking my kids and yeah, so I went and got a tpo because after I found out it was him and I made the criminal complaint, they put him on administrative leave, paid administrative leave, and allegedly the sheriff has asked the GBI to investigate, but as far as I know, the GBI hasn't accepted it. I think they were waiting for advisement from the prosecuting committee, council committee. I don't know what that's called, but nobody has talking talked to us after I made the initial complaint. Nobody's asked me any questions or, you know, nothing. And they placed them on and I don't even know if the GBI is investigating or not because I've emailed a couple times and asked for a point of contact in the criminal investigation and they won't they won't give me anything. At the time I last talked to Natasha, Mills had been placed on leave pending investigation. She said that nobody had reached out to her one way or the other, but within days of our conversation, it was announced publicly that Charles Mills had been fired by Cherokee County. Here is the full statement they released. The Cherokee Sheriff's Office recently received an allegation that one of its employees created a fake Facebook account that targeted an individual the deputy had previously arrested in 2025. Corporal Charles Mills was placed on administrative leave while the sheriff's office conducted an internal investigation into the allegation. Although the investigation remains ongoing, we have determined that there is sufficient evidence at this time to establish a violation of the sheriff's office code of conduct policy. As a result, Corporal Mills has been terminated from the Cherokee Sheriff's Office. Because the investigation remains ongoing, no additional details are being released at this time. signed Cherokee Sheriff's Office. Channel 2 Action News reported that the Cherokee Sheriff's Office has requested the GBI, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, to conduct an independent investigation. In a statement in Channel 2 Action News, the Sheriff's Office acknowledged Lopez filed a report about the Facebook page, but said we needed additional assistance from her, but she would not meet with detectives. The sheriff's office says it's asked the GBI to investigate. And while they're at it, the GBI should also conduct an investigation into the underlying incident that started all of this. Charles Mills violating the Fourth Amendment by barging into Natasha's house without a warrant and then arresting her in her home, also without a warrant. This is necessary because the prosecutors in Cherokee County, Georgia, have already told the news media that they're refusing to drop the charges against Natasha. The solicitor general's office told Channel 2 Action News that there are currently no plans to drop the obstruction of justice charges against Natasha Lopez. So, there's going to be a civil lawsuit for reasons you've explained. You have to wait until the criminal charges are finalized before you file it. Yes, there there will definitely be a 1983 lawsuit on behalf of multiple plaintiffs. And the only question is exactly what the allegations are going to be against which defendants. And frankly, the longer that this outrageous, unconstitutional, offensive, malicious prosecution continues, the stronger our damages claim is going to be, assuming she does ultimately beat the case. And again, we're still hoping that the judge does the right thing here. There was clearly no crime that took place here. Any reasonable judge can look at this and just say, "This case is dismissed." Judges do it all the time. Unfortunately, not as much as they should, but they do it all the time. If this judge is capable of doing that, he really should. And since he's the judge, that's kind of his job in this case. Or the the prosecutor, or as they call them there, the solicitor in Cherokee County, Georgia, could dismiss the case, the charges against Natasha at any time. He could, but that's looking more and more unlikely every day that this outrageous unconstitutional prosecution continues. Is that guy an elected position? It is. And he he literally just got reelected without opposition. So wonderful. No one ran against him. As far as your criminal case goes right now, are we just waiting on a ruling from the judge or is is there a court court hearing set? So, we have to give them a proposed order. So, does the solicitor and then I guess the judge is going to look at each and he'll decide which one he wants to to give to and he'll sign it. And that is due soon. We just went to When did we go to court? Maybe like two weeks ago. We had a three-week deadline. So, it'll probably be before our team. It was like 13 days ago. Hm. I think it was like 13 days ago because it was court on a Friday. We He should give us an order on that before the TPO hearing. Um I just honestly at this point would not be surprised if it you know obviously we go to trial. Like that's just how that's how they've treated me and that's I'm not expecting anything more at this point. Sometimes you just have to go to trial and then sometimes you have to appeal it. But I mean, you're you're on pretty solid ground here. You know that he came in your house without a warrant. That's very difficult for them to get past. I mean, he can he can claim that he had exigent circumstances and and when you do that, you create a factual issue that needs to be resolved in court, but that just needs to happen and it's not going to it's not going to work. you know, even if this judge allows it, the next one won't. I mean, they they can't. You know, you you will win if you just stick with it. And and you'll win hopefully you'll win the the civil case as well. And it's going to be that much easier now that he's been exposed as being this individual behind cyberstalking you and doxing you and I mean, you name it. How how many crimes has he committed? But that's what I'm saying. I'm like, this is like, let's just say the deleting of the evidence and then the witness intimidation, which are both felonies. And I even sent them like because I was like, "Okay, if he deleted it, maybe they're not taking the extra steps to get warrants and see this stuff." So, I sent them all the screenshots and stuff I had and even sent them where look like, you know, Google even deleted these images because of like what they were. You know what I mean? And like why is he not char? He's not going to be able to get away with this because of the secretive way and and it happened and that's why the prosecutor disclosed it immediately because it probably was horrifying and it's going to create all sorts of conflict. So what's going to happen probably is it's going to be an outside investigation. I think you mentioned the GBI is investigating like Yeah, it's going to be out of their hands. the fact that it's already been admitted to. I mean, he's I think he's toast. Ironically, I think if if anybody's first amendment rights were implicated, it it was yours because, you know, you're the one criticizing the government and in retaliation, the government or an agent of the government is out there creating this fake this fake Facebook profile and and and trying to damage you. Yeah. and and u arguably that's coming from the government. I mean that is there's your first amendment rights right there. They're yours being violated. And the fact that he had this fake Facebook page and was stalking you that never came out until after this last court hearing. Mhm. Until right after this last court hearing. Why won't the solicitor tell us where he obtained that information? Presumably after that hearing, his lawyer or the the state's lawyer, the solicitor, whatever you guys call it, talked with him afterwards and was like, "Hey, um, can you clarify that for me? What what the hell are you talking about?" And that's when he admitted that, "Yeah, I created this not so noble Facebook page." I mean, that that would be my guess. I think either that or there are a numerous amount of deputies, former law enforcement and current law enforcement, who have been anonymously just giving up bad deputies within the department left and right. And I think there's a good possibility that somebody that knew about the page, whether it was the sheriff or one of the command staff or Mills himself, you know, let it out to somebody and they ended up they ended up telling on him. But you would think that the solicitor would have to verify that, you know, verify if it was accurate or not before they disclosed. But I mean, they interviewed, they made Taylor be a witness, testify against me and my obstruction case, my son's girlfriend, brought her in, interrogated her, um, and recorded it, and they refused to give us the audio. Absolutely refused. So, like, there's some things like that, like things like that that they just will not give up. So, it was really shocking to me that they did find that out and just disclose it because other things that you would think is not as severe, they will not hand. They fight it tooth and nail. And that's that's the type of stuff we keep going back to these motions hearings for and arguing about. And I feel like we leave these hearings without a clear answer because the judge just doesn't give any clear rulings. He doesn't. And so, the solicitors just do whatever they want. Well, that's criminal criminal defense in a nutshell. It's so stressful. The whole thing is just so stressful. It's exhausting. Tell me about the the TPO. This is like a a restraining order. Mhm. It's a stalking restraining order. And I was granted it. So, when we when we get them here, it's granted on a temporary basis, usually up to 30 days. Um, and then you have to have a hearing where both sides can be heard and then they'll decide if it's going to be, you know, a permanent order or not. and the sheriff and the solicitors have retained the county attorney and then Mills just retained some other attorney and I guess they're going to he's going to probably try to fight it because I think if he has a TPO against him he cannot he can't have a weapon so which mean he couldn't be a law enforcement officer cuz for me it's insulting it's like why would you try to fight to be a it's like you're fighting to be able to harass me and abuse my family like you know what I mean like that's it's it's upsetting it's stressful Is there a hearing date for that? October. I think they're settling on October the 14th or the 16th. It was supposed to be the 20th, but I guess one of the solicitors is going out of town. So, the county attorney is looking at the 14th and 16th. We should have a a ruling on that sometime today. I think the judge should tell us when. But it's just one more thing. One more thing that I feel like they have put me through hell, you know, and it's just like they keep adding stuff to it and it's just it's exhausting. It really is. I'm tired. Well, you remember when we first talked, I told you I thought that their strategy would be to sort of wear you down or try to and and just get coers you into agreeing to something. Yeah, I won't, but I am tired. Here we are a year later and you're still at it. I almost feel like it's like every other week. Every other week lately we're in the courtroom in the courtroom and it's and there's no I feel like it's like there's no progress. There's no And it's a misdemeanor charge. Who do you know has the pleasure of being prosecuted on a misdemeanor charge? The chief deputy and an assistant solicitor are both prosecuting me. Probably because of the public exposure. Solomon, do you think that they are dragging this out and trying to convict Natasha because they were caught on camera violating the law? 1,000%. In fact, that's the only explanation I can think of at this point. And John, I know you've seen this before. Chris, I'm sure I'm sure has seen this as well. Uh very often when the police do something wrong, they reach out to their good friends in the prosecutor's office, even if they know they did something wrong and even if they all agree that the police did something wrong, the police know and the prosecutor knows that the prosecutor has absolute immunity. They can maliciously prosecute somebody. They can commit perjury. They can put false testimony up. They can do Brady violations. And it is categorically impossible to sue a prosecutor for a 1983 violation in limited extreme circumstances. You can do what's called a Monell claim. But simply put, prosecutors know that they are categorically immune from lawsuits. So they know that if they want to protect their good friends, the cops, with whom I'm sure they work all the time, they can just continue to prosecute and prosecute and prosecute, even if there's no basis whatsoever to proceed, because all they need to do at some point is get one minor little plea bargain out of something. For example, if somebody gets a criminal charge reduced to uh a parking ticket, then under a case called Hec He Hec versus Humphrey, you can no longer sue for malicious prosecution. And the prosecutors know that and the cops know that. And that's if I had to guess, I would guess that that's exactly what's going on here is combination of protecting the cop from what's ultimately going to be a 1983 lawsuit and um and trying to run out the clock on the statute of limitations. They already almost successfully ran out the one-year ad lightum notice, but we were able to get that ad lightum notice in in time because that's only one year. But now we only have another year to file the 1983 lawsuit. And if they just keep kicking the can down the road, they think we're not going to file suit before uh the time expires. And we will. We will if we have to. Well, at least you have some good lawyers representing you. I really love Solomon and Chris. They're really, really great. They're fighters like I am. And the great thing will be once the criminal case is resolved with the civil case, it won't be the same way where the the other side gets everything they want and they get to drag it out. They're going to have to produce all of the information that needs to be produced. So, who who else was involved with this Facebook page? When I filed the criminal report, as soon as I did that, in the same email, I told them if they notify Mills or if they tell Mills, they need all he needs to preserve. Do not delete that page. Don't delete the documents. I mean, I put it all in there in writing and he was allowed to do it anyway. It's one of the important things that people fail to understand because they see these videos where police officers are caught committing misconduct on video and they they automatically assume like, yeah, okay, well, there's a big payday right there. There's no criminal charges that that are going to attach. and and they fail to appreciate the fact that in rural areas, especially around the country, you have these little kangaroo court situations where you cannot just assume that the that the person didn't get convicted. I mean, YouTube is full of viral videos where you see cops misbehaving, violating the constitution, and in re in real life that the the victim was actually convicted because he accepted a plea deal. many times or just didn't have a lawyer. What I mean or just paid the citation, what whatever whatever it is like you cannot underappreciate the fact that these the law what the law actually is doesn't necessarily matter in a lot of these small towns and small counties across the country. And and a lot of times what they do in my personal experience and cases that I've covered is like they're doing here, they just keep keep the ca the criminal case open. They kick that can down the road and as time goes on they it's just they're holding this criminal penalty over somebody's head. And people get anxious about that and they don't have the money to hire lawyers many times and they they can't go get this new job or they can't do you know they can't get a loan what because they have these criminal charges pending. So they're being basically coerced and and eventually they they come to court and the cops the government the prosecutors have not provided any sort of discovery. they haven't yet provided the body cam footage and they get the person in court and they're like, "All right, here's the deal. You plead no contest or plead guilty to X, Y, and Z, and that's it. No jail time, no fine or minimum fine, $10 fine, whatever. And you're done. You can move on with your life." And eight times out of ten, people will agree to that because you know that that that's what they're cared about mo that's what they care about most is all right, I don't have to go to jail. I don't have to have this hanging over my head anymore. I don't I don't have to be hassled by this. And so that's how the government covers up these sorts of things is is they get some sort of plea. And then Solomon, as you mentioned, now that the victim has pled guilty to obstruction, for instance, now they go, if there's ever a civil lawsuit filed, they go to the federal court and they say, "Look, we you can't relitigate this. They can't relitigate this. They already admitted it in a state court and and and that is binding on this federal court. Therefore, you have to dismiss the case." We'll have to see, you know, what happens with the criminal case. Hopefully, it's resolved in your favor soon and then you can move on to the civil case and hopefully also a criminal prosecution of Mills and whoever else was involved. He is a criminal. I'm not the criminal. He is a criminal. I'm sorry for the people who believe that just because you put a badge on like you can never do no wrong, but there are criminals in every walk of life. He's a bad person. Hopefully his uh law enforcement careers come to an end. We'll see. Fingers crossed. Cops will make mistakes. Cops will violate the Constitution, sometimes on purpose, sometimes unintentionally, but they can only do so much alone. It's the prosecutors who generally have the discretion to drop the charges on their own or to push forward with prosecution. They are the first line of defense in policing the police. But many times, they just don't do it. Instead, they double down, even in the face of exculpatory video evidence. We've seen that in this video as well as the one before it involving the planted bag of cocaine. Where prosecutors violate their oath to uphold the Constitution, that leaves the judge as the last line of defense. And hopefully the judge in this case will end up ruling in Natasha's favor on the pending motion and her charges will be dismissed. A ruling could come out any day now. One way or the other, she has to win the criminal case in the end. Whether at the trial level or on appeal, there's just no getting around the fact that Charles Mills had no warrant nor any applicable exception. You can learn more about that in the part one video about this case, which I will link in the description below, as well as in the first pinned comment. Then once the criminal case is resolved, the civil lawsuit can be filed. Just because Charles Mills was fired by Cherokee County, that doesn't mean that he can't be sued. That also doesn't mean that he won't just pop up somewhere else in some different department in a different town or different county. He needs to be fully held accountable. And you can help by sharing this video, putting it in front of as many eyes as possible once enough people see it. It's more likely that the politicians who are the decision makers will do their job and will hold Mills accountable for what he's done and what others have done to aid him. And if they don't, then it's our job to see that they are replaced. If I hear anything else on this, I will let you know. You can follow along by subscribing both here and at the blog at the civil rightsawyer.com. You can follow me on X and the other socials, JohnBrian ESQ. Remember, our rights don't end where your fear begins. Freedom is scary. Deal with it.