Look, if you're going to argue, let me go and step out of the vehicle. Step out of the vehicle for me. Ma'am, step out of the vehicle for me. Ma'am, step out of the vehicle for me. Ma'am, step out of the vehicle now. Step out of your vehicle. Step out of your vehicle. Step out of your vehicle now. You're resisting law enforcement now. We deal with this all the time where we address this issue. I'm going to I'm going to beat this dead horse one more time. When law enforcement stops you during a traffic stop, you are considered seized under the Fourth Amendment. It is a seizure. During that seizure, we can dictate where you go. Whether you're in your car or out of your car, that ends up being a decision that we can make. Um, when this law enforcement officer, he does a good job of explaining it. Hey, this is why I stopped you. You know, any reason for he immediately gets backlash where it's he's he's getting getting an aggressive um, response and he's like, okay, I want you out of your car since you're not being you're not being forthcoming now. Um, and then he gives her he starts out, hey, get out of your car. It becomes more forceful. He goes over to driver side. I love it. Um, I like that he although he gave her multiple chances, but he didn't just stand there and say the same thing 25 times. He moved his position. He got access into the vehicle. Um, he you know, changed things and continuously um, gave himself the advantage in this scenario. So, I like it, but Pennsylvania v. Mimms says you got to get out. So, when he says get out, her only response is open up the door and get out if it's safe to do so and obviously it was in this case because she wanted to pick somewhere safe. Well, that means she can get out of the car. So, she doesn't have a dog in this fight.