Let me explain the law. >> Okay, let's hear it. >> Somebody called you in as a suspicious person. >> Okay, that's fine. >> I've identified you as that person. >> Okay. >> We are having a professional professional interaction. >> having a professional I >> So now, when we have a professional interaction with a law enforcement officer, and he requests your identification >> Okay. >> by law, you are required to give me your identification. >> a professional I >> So all I need to ask is your name. >> I'm I'm jogging in the morning, bouncing around, doing the same thing I do every day. If I've broken a law or done anything, then we can go from there. >> understand what the Supreme Court ruling was. Okay, I can explain case law. You've been identified as a suspicious person. >> nothing suspicious about what I'm doing. I'm jogging around. I haven't broken any laws. >> I didn't say you did. So what's the problem? >> like I do every morning. >> Guess what? We didn't see you out here yesterday. For what reason? >> I'm jogging. There's no reason for that. If you want to identify me, go in there and talk to my boss. You're not getting You're not getting any information from me. >> Okay, it was good talking to you. >> Okay. >> Let me ask you >> I understand. >> If you have a package that's to be [snorts] personally delivered to an individual >> Somebody called in a suspicious person complaint for jogging, and he wants my information, and I say no. There's no reason to have my information. I have not broken any laws. >> You're about to get yourself hemmed up. >> For what? >> For not identifying yourself. >> you're threatening me? >> I