Are you smarter than a lawyer? Let's see if you can answer this bar question. So, here's the question. Police arrive at a Nashville house party after a noise complaint. They see underage drinking through an open door and they enter without the permission of the owner to break up the party. Inside, they find cane on a table and arrest the homeowner. The homeowner argues that the entry was illegal. What is the most likely outcome? A. The evidence is admissible because police saw illegal activity in plain view. B. the evidence is suppressed because police needed a warrant to enter the home. Or C, the evidence is admissible because stopping underage drinking justifies entry. You be the judge. Answer like a lawyer and I'll comment on the first answer that's right below.