there's this saying from this ancient philosopher that goes something like to act without clear understanding to form habits without investigation to travel a path all one's life without knowing where it really leads such is the behavior of the multitude most people the multitude does not examine things before they say something the multitude will actually not inform themselves and stay cemented in ignorance and thus cognitive dissonance because they didn't take the time to educate themselves most will be brainwashed most are easily psyopt in other words there are psychological operators and social Engineers that we know exist from the church committee coming out of Congress back in the 1970s it was called The Church committee and they discovered that the CIA had infiltrated all of print and televised media this is back in the 1970s early 1970s 1974. Frank Church uncovered this Congress who's not for us the CIA who's not for us and they got together and admitted out in the open this isn't some Theory there was a conspiracy but this isn't a theory according to them and said that this Central Intelligence Agency had infiltrated the very thing that feeds us our information and then they started changing terminology to scare the unthinking masses and if you think it's a good idea to remain ignorant and if you think that in that ignorance you will be free if you remain ignorant and think you're going to continue to be free then you desire Something That Never Was it would never shall be so I get kind of a chuckle out of people who think they know what terms mean when they've been psychologically operated on to believe the exact opposite of what the words actually mean and one of those words that they attack is this term Anarchist my question is not am I are you my question is what is an anarchist so this guy right here says a bunch of stuff about you know hey you said this Brian guy was insane and I watched some of his videos and I wanted this is from a frauditor channel I'm not going to tell you the name of the channel because I really don't want to give these guys any more advertising than they already have but this guy basically said hey thanks for posting this video because of you I went ahead and subscribed to Brian's Channel and this guy says he that's me he is an anarchist anarchists are in no way rational people talking to let alone listening to the whole believing and owning nuclear weapons is true by default because he talking about me is an anarchist so Anarchist people are not rational people according to this guy so let's test that what is the definition the current definition of Anarchy as you know shown in you know Webster's Oxford or whatever Anarchist let's just Anarchist Anarchist Anarchist what is it it's a person who Advocates or promotes anarchism or Anarchy okay yeah that's fine but what it doesn't tell me what Anarchist is relating to or supporting anarchism or Anarchy now on this channel you know full well we don't support the initiation of violence that's why we record police because usually people are in power are the ones who initiate violence and peaceful people who haven't done anything wrong that is a cardinal rule that when you go against it you show yourself to be immoral and it's self-evident but then it kind of gives some synonyms nihilist Insurgent agitator subversive gorilla and then it says terrorist so according to this Oxford languages dictionary an anarchist is equated with the nihilist Insurgent agitator subversive person gorilla or terrorist but if you look at the just the simple etymology of the term because people people throw this term out as though it were some greasy-haired teenager all dressed in black with a oh I got my hoodie on I must be an anarchist throwing a Molotov cocktail across some Podunk Town Street into a store window and flipping cars and burning tires that's what they literally think an anarchist is but nothing could be further from the truth all an anarchist is is somebody who does not buy into the fiction that there are rulers and authorities who are over you that's it further an anarchist could literally be boiled down to hey I just want to be left alone I will leave you alone and if I want something from you I'll see if you're willing to give it up for example if you have a bottle of water and I have three dollars if you voluntarily mutually consensually agree to transfer that three dollars for a bottle of water if I want your bottle of water more than I want my three dollars if you want my three dollars more than you want your bottle of water and we changed it we both believe in our minds that we've mutually benefited that's a voluntary transaction it's a voluntary business transaction that has nothing to do with me thinking I am higher than you has nothing to do with you thinking you're higher than me it's literally a voluntarist and volunteeristic and Anarchist type transaction because there's no middleman ruler necessary to get in the way of us completing that transaction that's all it is but for some reason the FBI and most people believe that an anarchist is some kind of extremist who's a danger to National Security see what you have to ask yourself is is government legitimate are police legitimate are people who believe they have a higher claim over your life and property than you legitimate because if you boil it down government means Governor Mentis to control the mind or mind control giverno means to control meant Mente or mentis means the mind but that can be debated I'll give you that but govern means to control so the government is about controlling and when you look at government in action they're controlling you without your consent in other words they're violating your will to get what they want it's not what you want but it is what they want that's the opposite of voluntary that is compulsory that is by force it's by threats of force it's by coercion and that's how government operates and that's how government acts so when you're pro-government you you literally have a framework of belief it's a belief structure that believes that they a person or group of people has a higher claim or higher rights or more rights than you do and that is absolutely false if it's true that they have more rights than you then where did those more rights come from because you don't have them and you're just an individual like they are are they special human beings are they not human beings at all are they operating on a different plane are they gods because if they're just human beings like you then they have the same amount of Rights privileges and immunities that you do neither is greater than the other so what is government it is literally the right to rule I am part of government I've declared myself and my group has declared me and they all signed off on it look we have these fancy signatures on these pieces of parchment I am higher than you I can take money from you through taxation I can force you to pay property taxes I can force you to pay for insurance and license and registration and you have to pay me that's the idea of government and what if you don't do it well then they penalize you and they believe that they're perfectly right in their minds in doing so so let me ask you is government legitimate and though in other words is it legitimate is it true that one human being has the right to rule another human being because the last I looked when people had that belief it turns into something called oh gosh what is that word oh that's right slavery or servitude is it true that one man has higher authority over another man to the point where if this other man doesn't comply with the authority then he should be rightly punished because that's what people think when they see a cop beating up a person on a street corner they think well he must have done something to deserve it and usually what we see in these videos is that they did nothing to deserve it as a matter of fact the cop doesn't have the right to do that but all of a sudden this fiction takes over this Cloud forms on the brain and it's like oh he's got a uniform a badge and a gun and he claims to come with the authority of the state he must have legitimate power over that other man or woman whom he's abusing so when I see people saying something like well anarchists are not rational people they're not doesn't a rational person ask a question is government legitimate does Authority exist does a person or group of people have a higher claim over another person or group of people if the answer is no and if you live as a practical Anarchist in other words you don't need people telling you what to do you'll run your own life thank you if you operate on that plane and you operate under that that construct and Anarchy isn't a belief it's it's a knowing it's a anarchism is a knowledge government is a belief and you have to work real hard to continue to uphold the fiction that surrounds and upholds and undergirds and underpins that belief so who's the irrational one the one who's believing the Easter Bunny Tooth Fairy Santa Claus unicorns and pixie dust government or the person who's rational and asks the question hey does the Easter bunny Tooth Fairy Santa Claus unicorns and pixie dust do they really exist and have authority over my life and if the answer is no and if the answer is I don't need somebody ruling me I don't need somebody forcing me to do something against my will because you know on the sexual plane that's called rape if you force somebody to have sex with you that's called rape um the life plane if you take somebody's life and they didn't want it taken that's called Murder anytime you violate somebody's consent the person who did the violating no matter if they have a uniform no matter if they're called congressmen it doesn't matter if they're called Senator it doesn't even matter if they're called president of the United States and the leader of the Free World if they violated another person's consent they are the criminal it's no measure of good mental health to be considered well adjusted to a profoundly sick Society in almost all of society buys into what they claim are the facts that government actually exists when all it is is a construct of belief if I'm wrong I want to hear the argument against it if there's a logic that's Superior to what I just said and this doesn't come from me this is just classical observation this is just self-evident truth if you have a logical argument against it I want to hear it in the comments section as far as I understand it anarchists are the only rational people and if you live this way then you yourself are an anarchist and you're denying anarchism to become what is known as a status there's only two kinds of people in the world the anarchist who just wants to live under voluntary means not forcing anybody not coercing anybody not threatening anybody and the status who doesn't mind violating forcing threatening and coercing people to get their way leave your thoughts about this for the world in the global thought police in the comments section below if you haven't done so already subscribe to this channel hit the Bell notification icon give it a thumbs up share it with everybody know don't forget to subscribe to my email list through my website highimpactflix.com that's high impactflix.com and I will see you in the next video foreign foreign [Music]