On June 2nd, 2026, officers with the Ankin Police Department responded to a call from a highly intoxicated woman claiming her friend stole her car keys. This is the second time they have been to this individual's house this night and the third time she has called 911 without having a real emergency. >> She stole my car keys. >> Okay. >> How do you know that? >> They're in our car and she took them. >> When did that take place? earlier tonight. This is my daddy. He works for >> Okay. >> Do you want to talk to him? >> Not really. >> She's still my car. He so I literally can't go anywhere. >> How come you're out and about right now? >> I want to take a fresh air outside cuz I have panic attacks. >> Okay. How drunk are you right now? >> I'm not drunk. >> Okay. When was the last time you were drinking? >> Like 12 hours ago, probably. 5 in the afternoon. >> Someone's waving it down. Someone's waving. >> Okay. Who's Who's >> Who's that? You know her? >> Hey. >> Okay. >> Sorry. Yeah. Nope. Nope. Nope. You don't go anywhere. Nope. You come here. >> Sit tight. >> Yeah. She stole my car keys. >> And what do the car keys look like? >> They have a caterpillar on them. And they have a red like a >> So, the reason I asked was when I was here last earlier tonight, >> I saw a pair of car keys sitting on your bed. >> Is there a chance that those are them? >> Which ones? >> Uh, they were sitting on the >> left side. >> I don't quite remember necessarily exactly what they look like. I just They were car keys >> cuz I cuz I have two car cops. >> Two what? >> Two car fobs. Two car two car fobs. So, you can still drive your car with the fob you have. >> Yes, but I believe that's theft. >> Did she intentionally take those car keys? >> Yes. >> But how do you know that she intentionally took those cars? >> Because she went inside the car and she took them. >> You saw her do that. >> She went just now telling us about this. >> Because I was scared. I didn't want to get in trouble. >> Why would you get in trouble? >> In trouble. >> You've already called 911 multiple times. >> Yeah. She basically I put the car I put the car keys in there and >> car keys where >> inside of her car. >> So you put the car keys inside of her car. >> It says the last location was E Avenue today at 149. >> So you put the car keys inside of her car and the car keys are inside her car and you're saying that she stole your car keys, but you put the keys inside her car. >> Yeah, because I didn't want to drive obviously. >> That sounds like you left car keys inside of her car >> and then she left. I don't think she knowingly stole them because you just said that she knowingly took them, but it sounds like you put the keys inside her car >> because >> I don't think she knowingly took those keys. >> She did because she threatened me. >> Okay. >> Okay. >> And this is where the original story starts to unravel. The woman initially says her friend stole her keys, but when the officer carefully walks through the timeline, she admits that she put those keys inside the other woman's car herself. That distinction matters. Forget the emotion for a moment. The question is whether there is evidence that the other person knowingly took something belonging to her without permission. Based strictly on what we're hearing here, the officer is struggling to establish that. Then the explanation shifts again from allegedly stolen keys to an alleged threat. That's a major difference. A threat, if supported by credible evidence, could obviously be investigated separately, but it doesn't automatically transform misplaced property into theft. Do you think the officer is right to question her version this aggressively? >> How did she threaten you? >> She said she was going to come get me. >> All right. Uh, when did she say that? >> Earlier tonight >> when you were in person with one another. >> She said, "Yeah, girl, like you're not good or whatever." And then basically make fun of my mom dying and all that stuff. >> Um, so I actually talked earlier tonight. She told me a little bit different story about how everything went down. She didn't say anything about her hitting you. She said that you kind of got upset in the bar with her out of nowhere and she left because she didn't feel comfortable being around you. >> I didn't feel comfortable being around her. She jumped out. How many times have you called her in the last 2 hours? >> I'm not sure, but she jumped out of side of a window at a frat party. >> Okay, so you're just not making a whole lot of sense to me. >> And pissed >> right now. How many times have you called 911 about all this? >> Probably three. >> Three times. Have all of them felt like they were emergencies when you have called? >> Cuz I want my car keys back cuz my family's poor. >> So you have car keys. You left your car keys in her car cuz you got a ride with her, right? >> Uhhuh. >> And she left not knowing that she that she had the car keys. >> She knew that she had them. >> Okay. How do you know that? >> Because I said, "Is that okay if I if I put my car keys in there?" And she said, "Yeah, that's fine." >> And I put them in there. >> That sounds like theft. >> That does a sound. >> That sounds like you put something inside someone's car. You mentioned, "Hey, my thing's inside your car." And then eventually you went separate ways after, I'm assuming a decent amount of drinking. Is that correct? >> She made me very uncomfortable. I don't like her. >> Okay, that's hardly reasons to call 911 either. Did I tell you earlier that I would arrest you if you call 911 again? Yes, but I feel like it just feels like she took my keys. >> And again, you didn't tell me that why when I was here. >> Because I just didn't want to get her in trouble. >> You didn't want to get her in trouble. >> That doesn't make sense. You told her, you've called her repeatedly saying that you are going to call the cops on her and get her charged. >> The first call to 911 was that you wanted her to go to jail. >> Yep. >> Because she took my car keys. That's not That's not why you called the first time, though. >> She took my car keys. My car keys, too. >> And my mom died. >> At this point, the encounter has moved well beyond a disagreement between friends. According to the officers, this is already the third 911 call that night, and they have previously warned her about calling again over matters they did not consider emergencies. Now, they are also dealing with apparent intoxication in a public setting. Notice how the officer repeatedly tries to get a simple yes or no answer about the breathalyzer while she keeps returning to the same request. Can I go inside my house? That's important because the officers are no longer treating this as a casual conversation. They're trying to establish whether she will cooperate with their investigation. And once someone is being detained or arrested, simply wanting to walk away doesn't necessarily end the encounter. The big question now is whether she will cooperate or whether this gets even worse. >> So, you don't want to take this breathalyzer? >> Please just go inside. My house. >> Would you be willing to take this breathalyzer? >> Can I please just go inside? My house is right there. >> Are you willing to do this breathalyzer test? Yes or no? Anything that's not a yes or no? >> Please just go inside. >> We We just got to get an answer from you first. >> I won't do anything again. I promise I'm just going to go inside. >> Are you going to do this? Yes or no? Or are you going to refuse? >> I'm going to get arrested. Can I please just go inside? >> No, you're >> What do you What do you mean you're going to get arrested? >> Why? >> Isabelle, listen to them. >> Are you going to >> Can I please just go inside? >> Isabelle, last time. Are you going to take this breathalyzer? Yes or no? If you say yes, it's a yes. If you say anything, if you say no or anything that's not no, we're going to assume it's a no. >> Can I breathize and go inside? You can breathalyze, but I'm not going to tell you you're going to get to go inside. >> What? My My house is right there. >> Are you going to breathalyze? Are you going to take this test? >> My house is right there. >> Okay. I'm going to assume that's >> We We understand that, but um we need a yes or a no with this breathalyzer. It's just takes about 5 seconds. You just blow into this tube. >> We don't My house is right there. >> That's correct. Your house is right over there. >> I'm just going inside my house to go to >> Nope. You're out here in the public right now. Are you going to take this breathalyzer? Yes or no? We're not going to keep doing this circle where we keep saying the same thing. Yes or no? >> Just go inside my house. >> So, I think we can assume that's a no. You're refusing to take the test. We've asked you multiple times. I gave you the parameter saying if you said anything besides yes or no, it would be considered a refusal. You understand that you're refusing to this breathalyzer right now. >> Dad, I'm literally outside my house. >> Okay, that's a refusal. Okay. Nope. Already told you you're not free to leave. >> Oh, are you trying to do it now? Are you Are you consent? Are you consenting? >> Yeah. >> All right. Big breath in. Big breath in. Blow. Blow. Blow. Blow. Blow. Blow. Keep going. Keep going. >> I've not driven. I promise. >> 624 log PBT.143. Okay. Grab the tip of that straw and pull up. >> Wait. This. >> Yep. Pull up. >> Oh, sorry. >> It's okay. Can I please just go to bed? >> No. >> Nope. Um [ __ ] Put in your bed. >> Can I please just go to bed? >> No. >> Why? >> I was actually scared. Okay. >> Can I please just go to bed, please? >> And now we have an important development. After repeatedly avoiding a direct answer, she eventually agrees to the breath test and the officer records a PBT reading of.143. The transcript does not provide enough information to determine every legal consequence of that number by itself. And a roadside breath test is not necessarily the same thing as the evidentiary testing used in every jurisdiction. But it certainly gives the officers additional information about her condition. More importantly, the officers say she is visibly intoxicated and has been drinking while she has repeatedly insisted she was not drunk and had last consumed alcohol many hours earlier. That creates a clear conflict between her account and what officers say they are observing. From here, the issue isn't simply the missing keys anymore. It's her conduct in public, the repeated 911 calls, and whether she is capable of safely remaining where she is. My dad, please. >> You've you're out in a public place right now and you are clearly intoxicated and so can >> you have also called 911 repeatedly for matters that were not an emergency to the public. >> Please just go to bed. I'm sorry that were not an imminent risk to yourself or someone else. So right now you're going to be placed under arrest. >> No, please don't behind your back. Republican talks. >> Please don't be an improper use of 911. >> Don't get nope. Don't get additional charges for resisting. Put your hand behind. >> Don't resist. >> Yep. There you go. Nope. Stop moving. Please don't resist. Dad, >> you got to put down the phone. >> Yep. >> Dad. >> I'll take that. Can you please just let me go inside, please? My car is right there. >> Make sure that she is close enough that she won't slip it. Can >> you please just go inside? It's gone. >> No, it's gone. >> Yes. I promise. I promise. I know you promised, but you're actually under arrest now. >> Are those too tight? >> Please, can I please just go inside my house? Please >> under arrest. You cannot. >> Why? >> Uh for public intox and misuse of 911. >> But I wasn't trying to. She scared me. >> Double lock locked your cuffs to make sure they don't get >> You want to take another breathalyzer? >> Can I please just go inside my house? My house is right there. Please. >> Do you want to take another breathalyzer? Yes or no? Let's go. >> Can I please? >> I'll assume that's a no. So, you're refusing the post arrest. >> Okay, sure. Fine. >> No. Yeah, we'll do it in the car. They're just offering it to you. >> Please. Can My house is right there. >> I know. >> And the police car is right here. That's where you're going. >> Can you please just go inside? >> My house is right there. Please. >> This is probably the most frustrating part of the encounter for her because from her perspective, the solution seems incredibly simple. Her house is right there, so why can't she just walk inside? But once officers have placed someone under arrest, proximity to their home doesn't erase the arrest. The officers are telling her exactly why they're taking her in, alleged public intoxication and repeated misuse of 911. They also warn her that resisting or refusing lawful commands could potentially lead to additional charges. Notice too that they repeatedly explain what they're doing, ask about injuries, check her pockets, and offer another breath test. Whether every legal conclusion would ultimately hold up in court is a separate question, but the transcript clearly shows the officers documenting their reasoning as the situation progresses. At this stage, the key issue is no longer whether she wants to go home. It's whether she can comply with the arrest without creating another problem. >> You want to do a quick search? >> Yep. You have anything on you that's going to stick poker harmony? >> Please just go inside my house. any pockets at all on your body? >> A domestic violence >> victim. Can I please just go sleep? I have court in 2 weeks. Can I please just go inside? Please. I'm begging you. Please. >> Please. >> Okay, let's take a seat in the car. >> Can I please just talk to you about what happened? >> Absolutely. But we got to sit in the car first. >> Can I please just go inside maybe after? >> No. Too late. Let's sit in. >> Why? >> Because you are under arrest. >> So, let's let's sit down. If you don't get inside the car, you're going to be charged with interference as well. >> Can I please just talk to you? Can I maybe just let go after? >> Absolutely. Take a seat. >> Okay. Can I maybe just go home after if I talk to you? >> No. After you go to jail, >> you're under >> Why? >> You're under arrest. If you don't get inside the car right now, you're going to be charged with interference as well. >> Why? >> Because you're not listening to the lawful commands that we're giving and you're interfering with our operation. >> 624 log one5. >> Yep. There you go. Let me get you buckled in. >> Hey, daddy. You can call him from the jail. Uh, so you do or don't want to do another breathalyzer. You willing to do this again? >> What did I do wrong? >> We just technically have to offer you a second one after you've been arrested. >> You just need a yes or no? >> What did I do wrong? >> Uh, you were intoxicated in public and you kept calling 911 for non-emergent issues. >> So again, do you want to do this breathalyzer? >> Because she threatened me. >> Do you want to do this breathalyzer? Yes or no? >> She threatened me with her dad's money. >> Well, that's not a threat. Uh, do you want to do this breathalyzer? Yes or no? >> Sure. Can I please just go home? Please. >> Can I please just go home? My house is right there. >> Nope. We >> Can I please just go home? >> No. Please. >> Unfortunately, no. That is You cannot just go home. >> No, I can't. >> You cannot just go home. >> My house is right there. Please. >> Oh, yeah. Teamwork. >> Can I please just go home? Are you still willing to do this? >> Can you please just go home? Seriously, my house is right there. I don't have car keys. She has >> Are you willing to do this? >> Yes. Can I please go home after? >> Uh, no. You cannot go home. >> Again, if you do not blow in the tube, it's a refusal. Yes or no? >> If I blow into the tube, can I please just >> Absolutely not. We've already told you you're going to you're going to jail. >> Why? >> We technically have to offer you the second test. Are you going to blow into this tube? yesterday. >> Why am I going to jail? >> Okay, we've explained it. It's a refusal. >> Nope. >> No. Too late. >> No. I do it. >> Okay. >> Go. You need anything? >> Your phone's in the passenger seat. >> Perfect. >> Thank you. >> Now, the officers give the clearest explanation of the arrest. According to their account, there are two separate allegations driving the charges. first that she was intoxicated while in a public place, and second, that she repeatedly used 911 for matters officers determined were not emergencies. Her repeated statement that she was afraid of the other woman is certainly relevant to understanding her mindset, but the officers are saying that fear did not justify repeatedly using emergency services for a situation they believed could be handled another way. And there's another important detail. The officer later explains that she had already been told to go inside earlier, but she remained outside and was observed on the road. That becomes significant because she repeatedly argues that she was simply in her own backyard. At the end of the day, the legal outcome would depend on the evidence and applicable law, but the officers clearly believed they had enough grounds to make the arrest. >> I'll do it. >> Too late. Why? I'm scared of her. Go inside my house. >> One female to PCJ. Start mile zero. >> My >> I've already explained that to you. >> Why? >> You're intoxicated and you're in a public place. Therefore, you are committing the crime of public intox. So, you were under arrest for public intox. >> I'm not. You also called 911 multiple times for things that were not an emergency, which is called misuse of 911. So, you're also getting charged with that. >> Why? >> I've already explained that to you. >> I'm scared of her. >> Okay, you're going to jail. >> Please, no. >> It's too late. >> Can you please just tell me the story, please? Can you please just take me home? >> No, you're not going home. >> Why? My house is literally right there. >> You're not going home. >> Please let me go home. my phone again. >> No, >> I promise you on my life. >> No, you're not going home. I'm sorry, but you're not going home. >> Why? >> Cuz you're under arrest. >> Why? >> Cuz you're under arrest. >> Why? >> I explained that to you multiple times. You were clearly highly intoxicated several hours ago when I spoke to you the first time. You are still intoxicated several hours later, implying that you are extremely intoxicated originally. You never drop a car or anything. Inside my house. >> You were not inside your house when we arrived. >> I was outside my backyard. >> That is a public place. >> It's not a public backyard. >> It is a public place. >> No, it's my backyard. >> Well, you can tell that to the judge. >> If you continue to say that I'm not going to talk to you anymore and we're just going to drive in silence. >> I'm just trying to live. That's not an excuse to be intoxicated in a public place or call 911 repeatedly >> outside of my backyard. >> You were not in your backyard when we saw you. You were on the road. >> Yes, I was. >> Okay. I told you to go to bed several hours ago, which you did not do. >> So, here's where this chaotic encounter ultimately lands. According to the transcript, officers responded after the woman reported that her friend had stolen her car keys, but questioning revealed that she had placed the keys inside the friend's vehicle herself. Officers also said this was the third 911 call that night involving matters they did not consider emergencies. They observed what they described as significant intoxication, and the recorded roadside breath test showed a PBT reading of.143. After she continued asking to go home and remained outside, officers placed her under arrest and explained that the charges were public intoxication and misuse of 911. The transcript does not provide a later courtroom ruling or final disposition, so we cannot claim what a judge ultimately decided. What we can say is that a dispute over car keys escalated dramatically because of repeated emergency calls, conflicting explanations, and continued resistance to the officer's instructions. Was the arrest justified based on what you heard. Let us know your opinion. If you found this case as shocking as we did, make sure to hit that like button, share your thoughts in the comments, and don't forget to subscribe for more jaw-dropping courtroom breakdowns.