Transcript Details
Back to Video Edit
Language
en
Format
text
Source
scrappa
Auto-generated
Yes
Confidence
N/A
Created
2026-10-22 23:58
Transcript Content
You said that. >> [music] >> Yeah! I never resisted you, you ignorant >> [music] >> I am a mother and you just did something On August 3rd, 2025, Key West Police responded to a trespass complaint at Rick's Bar on Duval Street, Florida. Come over here. Look at my shoes. Let's go. Like that's right. You. You. Really? What's your idea? You want to trespass? You want to trespass? I'm not ugly. I'm not ugly. Go wait by my car. Why? I'm sorry. I didn't mean to do that. You did. Excuse us. Excuse us. There's a [ __ ] car coming. Don't cuss at me. Okay? I'm not your friend. What's your first I'm going to cuss >> first name? Seriously. What's your first name? First name, please. >> [music] >> Or do you want to go to jail? How could you possibly take me to jail? >> I need your name because they want you trespassed. >> how could you possibly take me to jail? Do you want to identify yourself to law enforcement? That doesn't [ __ ] give you the right to take me to jail. They want you trespassed. So I need your name. That doesn't give you the right to take me to jail and I need you to identify yourself. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Don't move. All right. Now, just so you know, for the tune of it, you can run from me. I got her in custody. I didn't do anything. Ow. Ow. Why? Why? That hurt. Why? That hurt. That hurt. You should have never ran. Told you I'm not your friend. Okay. Well, come over here. Now, you're going to jail for resisting. Bro, I never resisted. I literally never resisted. You did this. You. You did this. I never resisted, you ignorant I never resisted. You're so f- You were so f- You're You know that, right? You know that, right? You know you're Have a seat. Under Florida statute section 810.09, trespass after warning is a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year in county jail. The statute requires only two elements: a lawful notice to depart issued by an authorized person and willful refusal to comply. No violence, no prior criminal history, no intent beyond remaining on the premises. Probable cause for arrest exists the moment those two elements are satisfied. The subject's statement that "Doesn't give you the right to take me." reflects a legally incorrect premise. In Atwater versus City of Lago Vista, decided in 2001, the Supreme Court held that custodial arrest for a minor misdemeanor is constitutionally permissible, even when a citation would seem proportionate. The officer's authority to arrest is not contingent on the subject's agreement, her personal circumstances, or her assessment of the situation's fairness. When the subject failed to submit to custody, she committed a second offense, resisting an officer without violence. Florida statute section 843.02. Section 843.02 requires no physical force from the subject. Passive non-compliance, simply refusing to present her hands or move toward the vehicle satisfies the statute. Regarding the force used by officers, under Graham versus Connor, 490 U.S. 386, decided in 1989, reasonableness is evaluated from the officer's perspective at the moment of the decision. Three factors govern that analysis. The severity of the offense, whether the subject posed an immediate threat, and whether she was actively resisting. All three factors supported the use of a controlled takedown here. The offense was a chargeable misdemeanor. The subject was non-compliant. The environment, a narrow alley at 2:00 a.m., created legitimate officer safety concern. As to the verbal abuse in City of Houston versus Hill, the Supreme Court held in 1987 that profanity directed at law enforcement is, as a general rule, protected speech under the First Amendment. Officers may not arrest a person solely for insulting them. The subject was not arrested for her language. She was arrested for trespass and resisting, two independent legal bases unaffected by anything she said. Why Why did you arrest me? Resisting without violence. Uh but I didn't do that. >> I explained to you that the >> No. You're not going to let me speak or >> No. You're so feared. The business wanted you to trespass. >> No. That's why I need your name to put you in the call. You refused to ID yourself. That's not true. >> you took off running. That's not true. >> like to These buildings are >> Would you like to identify yourself now? If not, they'll fingerprint you at the jail. Would you like to ID yourself now? I am a mother, and you just did something Are you willing to ID yourself? No? Huh? You don't want to identify yourself? Copy. That's fine. My entire family is in New Hampshire. I'm the only one here. Do you realize that? You guys have no idea who I know. No idea. That's cute. That's cute. No idea who I know. So cute. I didn't do anything wrong. You have nothing on me. I did nothing wrong. You better pray to [ __ ] god that I am back home before my daughter gets home, you [ __ ] ignorant I've done nothing. I'm in trouble because I know someone? You stupid How can you take me down because I know someone? Swear to god. You [ __ ] better have me home before my daughter gets home. You're an ignorant You're literally an ignorant What the do I know? [screaming] What do I know? What do I know? What do I know? What do I know? What do I know? What do I know? I don't know anything. What do I know? What do I know? I would never All I care about is my daughter. You [ __ ] ignorant. I don't know anything. I can't wait for me to prove it. You're a [ __ ] piece of [ __ ] I don't know anything. I just All I know is that I love my daughter. You know nothing. I hate you. You know nothing. You know nothing. You're trying to get my name. You know my name, you ignorant. She was ultimately taken into custody. Grades. The subject receives a D. She converted a citable trespass into a multi-charge arrest through non-compliance at every stage. Her post-arrest claim of non-resistance is directly contradicted by the visual record. Her invocation of personal status, I am a mother, carries no legal weight under any applicable statute or precedent. The appropriate remedy for a disputed arrest is compliance followed by legal challenge not resistance. Lesson, let us know if there is an interaction or legal topic that you would like us to discuss in the comments below. Thank you for watching and don't forget to check out our second channel Street Body Cam for even more police interaction and courtroom content.
Danger Zone

This action cannot be undone. Please be certain.