speak with you. You're the driver of the
vehicle. I'm trying to talk to you. I'm
asking you to make contact with me on
the other side of the vehicle so I can
talk with you. Okay.
>> 499 traffic 479 traffic.
>> You're under arrest. Open the door.
>> Mike, stop. Use this.
>> You're under arrest. Open the door
for
>> What are you being What?
>> What am I doing for? So, you're not
being incarcerated. You're being
arrested for DUI.
>> I'm not under the influence, sir.
>> Okay.
>> Yourself. If you are being detained and
not under arrest,
>> like this guy right here, does he have
to identify himself if he is only being
detained and not?
>> Cops often believe their badge puts them
above everyone else. But arrogance has
consequences. In one case, a dirty cop
gets humbled when he faces a criminal,
showing how quickly power can slip away.
These encounters reveal what happens
when abuse of authority collides with
real resistance and justice finds a way
to strike back in the most unexpected
places. At the start of 2023 in
Lancaster, Ohio, a simple traffic
quarrel turned into a full show. Judith
had a small crash and a police officer
saw it, but instead of dealing with it
right away, he chose to follow the truck
and pull them over. Of course, because
when you witness a physical attack, the
most urgent thing is to check license
plates. But this was only the beginning.
>> Refused to talk to me. He tells me,
"Forget you. I ain't identifying myself
to you." And that's where we're at now.
>> Okay. He
>> damage on that vehicle,
>> just a mirror, touching mirrors. Um,
sheriff's deputy, I'm not sure where he
he came from. He must have been behind
me or close to me cuz then he comes down
here. They refuse to identify and then
he calls supervisor. So she's refusing
to identify herself
>> as well as there's a passenger in the
back. He's they're recording as well as
the gentleman in the passenger side of
the plate. Right.
>> Correct.
>> So she's refusing to identify herself.
>> Right. He's refusing to identify
himself.
>> Okay. As far as him right now, let's not
worry about him. Let's worry about her.
>> She's being the driver. She
>> No plate on the vehicle.
>> No plate on the vehicle. Yep. That's
what we got. Walker. So let's let's get
her out of the vehicle. Got you.
Refuses. All right. Well, we'll get in
the vehicle. Okay, we'll pull her out 25
her. She's not cooperating with us
>> and we'll
>> The patrol quickly decided that the
driver and passengers were refusing to
give identification instead of
recognizing their civil right to stay
silent until speaking with a lawyer. The
officers saw it all as a threat. What's
their plan here? Well, why respect the
law when it's easier to start planning
how to pull people out of the car right
away? From that moment, the situation
began to escalate. cuz there's no uh
plates on the vehicle.
>> Okay.
>> My next problem is I hope she doesn't
try to take off on us because
>> Right.
>> Uh just because she's not pinned in or
anything. So
>> I'm I'm in front of her. I can
>> uh
you have your guy. We'll block her from
going anywhere. Jones, you probably pull
up a little bit closer maybe.
>> That way she doesn't take off running on
us.
That's good. That's good.
I'm not going to walk between the cars
there.
Watch yourself.
>> Yep.
>> All right.
>> Sergeant Thirsten entered the scene like
a great hero. He tried to talk with
Judith, but she didn't roll down her
window. His conclusion, if a woman
refused to speak right away, well, it's
time to break the glass because, you
know, in America, refusing to talk to a
cop instantly automatically means you're
suspected of starting a coup. What
happened next would soon show why so
many people no longer trusted the
police.
[Applause]
Hi there. My name is Sergeant Thirsten.
Ma'am, I'm talking to you. You're the
driver.
Ma'am, I'm asking you to roll the window
down to speak with me. You're the driver
of this vehicle.
Can you open the door so I can talk to
you?
>> Open the door.
>> Open the door.
Ma'am, I'm trying to speak with you.
[Applause]
>> Okay, one second here.
>> Ma'am, I'm trying to speak with you.
You're the driver of the vehicle. I'm
trying to talk to you. I'm asking you to
make contact with me on the other side
of the vehicle so I can talk with you.
Okay,
>> ma'am. Can you step out of the vehicle
so I can speak with you?
Ma'am, I'm asking you to speak.
>> Ma'am, I will be breaking the window and
asking pulling you out.
>> Thirsten kept repeating the open the
door command over and over again. His
negotiation tactic was simple. Threats,
threats, and more threats. The law
clearly said that a driver had the right
to know the reason for the stop before
opening the door. But here, if you
didn't cooperate right away, they were
ready to show you exactly what the
American version of freedom looked like.
>> Not working. If you don't cooperate our
vehicle, we are allowed to be secure in
our personal.
>> I'm asking you to open the door on that
side.
>> Constitutional rights.
>> Do you not understand that?
>> Ma'am, I'm asking you for an
identification
>> and protect. Ma'am,
>> open the door. I'm going to break the
window. I'm going to break the window
and assist you out of the vehicle. You
either open the door,
open the door and speak to me.
Open the door and speak to me.
I'm asking you to identify you. Identify
yourself. You have a driver's license.
Ma'am,
you're the
>> The officers noticed there might have
been a child in the back seat, but that
didn't slow them down. Instead of
assessing the risk and calling child
protection services, they went on with
their plan for a violent entry.
Ironically, they justified it all by
saying that they only wanted to identify
their driver. Yes, because smashing
windows and spraying pepper spray was
surely the fastest way to get a driver's
license.
>> Well, I'm talking to you. I'm asking you
to open the door and speak to me.
>> I'm not going to continue asking you.
I'm going to break your window and
assist you out of the vehicle.
>> I'm asking you to open the the door.
>> Ma'am, I need a driver's license.
He's asking if they can deploy OC into
the car.
>> Give me one second.
>> 47. Copy of VIN number, please.
>> I already ran it.
>> Yep.
>> Okay.
>> I ran it. Go ahead.
>> Disregard. I believe 1429 ran it.
>> Yep.
>> Walker,
>> he's asking. In the background, they
talked about whether to use batons or
pepper spray as if they were choosing
appetizers at a restaurant. Not once did
they consider that the law required only
proportional force. No, for them this
was just routine because officers like
these were used to being above the law
and of course never punished for their
awful behavior.
>> Watch the pull.
>> Hey, uh somebody in the back seat. I
don't know if it's a child.
>> One one second here.
child or
>> with a male
>> 47. We have another uh unit down here.
47 to 1187
out.
>> The plan grew more serious. shut down
traffic, block the road, and set up a
small war scene. And all of this came
from one minor crash and a refusal to
show an ID. Did any of these officers
stopped to think that the law required a
proportional response? Of course not.
They acted like it was all a
battlefield. And just when it seemed
over the top, the show was far from
finished.
>> Go ahead. It wouldn't hurt.
>> So, do you need a Do we need a Paton at
this point? What? Yeah, I do. Yeah.
Yeah.
We have a uh sovereign citizen type
person.
Push that right into the window. It'll
shatter.
>> Perfect.
>> All right.
>> What is it? Like a little clicker?
>> I think so.
>> Push it in the window. It'll shatter.
>> I've got the window breaker, too.
>> Okay.
>> Uh, you want to hold that, Daniel?
>> Yep.
>> The officers discussed how they would
enter the vehicle. There were three
people inside, but to them it was as if
they were facing a dangerous gang. They
talked about sovereign citizens as if
everyone inside was a terrorist. They
even planned to use pepper spray on the
miners sitting in the back seat. I know
you think these officers weren't acting
normally, but believe me, you haven't
seen anything yet. So, we've got uh the
stop six behind the vehicle there tire
so we can uh
where's my load? Is he here yet?
Jones.
>> So, here's the plan. We got three people
in the car.
Uh
Hey, let's uh
>> You want me to shut it down?
>> Why don't you shut it down? Yeah.
>> 47 1187 would just shut the westbound
traffic down right there. Shut the block
off.
The worst part came when one officer
spoke over the radio with full
confidence. Just listen to how he
described their refusal to show ID. As
if they were the most dangerous
criminals ever. Strange, isn't it? How
all these officers once swore at the
start of their careers to protect the
constitutional rights of all citizens.
And now look at them.
>> Identify the driver. They're refusing.
>> We're going to make entry into the
vehicle.
Hey, don't get between the cars.
>> Is that you back here?
>> Yeah. What do we got going on?
>> Uh then there's three people in the car.
Two male, one female driver refusing to
identify themselves. They're saying
they're holding up paper saying they're
sovereign citizens. We're going to make
entry into the front, get the driver
out, and then we'll uh I'd like to hook
the front passenger up to obstructing
with us.
>> I've got the window breaker, so I'm
going to take driver out first, right?
>> I'll take Y.
>> So, I need I'll wait for him alone to
get here. But, uh, looks like they're
going to have less lethal, but I'm going
to uh we need to have
>> The police decided that she was going to
go to jail for obstruction. In their
interpretation, obstruction simply meant
you didn't do what they wanted right
away. Of course, you did not need to be
a legal expert to know that obstruction
was a secondary offense, and you cannot
be jailed for it. Still, these officers
followed their own version of the law,
and that's what exactly made them so
dangerous. Once we we're gonna have to
get her out and
>> he's got a knife one of the guys. So
that's why I want someone to be covered.
>> The male does.
>> Stop right there. Stop right there. Stop
right there.
>> Stop right there.
There you go.
>> Tell you what I told you. We're going to
>> Listen here, guys.
>> I'm going to go on the other side with
somebody and have cover. I don't want
any crossfire. So, I need uh She's
refusing to open the door, not
complying. Uh break the window. I'm
going to pull her out and uh do what you
need to do to get her out. Uh she's
seuckled in.
My back window.
>> Uh
>> hey, Mike. It's we're have to get her
out.
>> After planning their tactic for who
knows how many minutes, the officers
teamed up like cowards because of course
they would never act this way alone. It
was easy to play the hero when
surrounded by cops holding guns. But
what they did next was even worse. They
put the child in the back seat in real
danger and they didn't care at all.
>> Mike, stop. Use this.
>> You're under arrest. Open the door.
>> Step out. You're getting hosed. Step out
now. Step out now.
>> Step out.
>> You're under arrest. Step out of the
vehicle now.
>> Step out of the vehicle now.
>> OC.
[Music]
>> Step out now.
>> Step out now.
>> Step out. You're going to run out of
air.
you too much. These guys are the window.
>> Step out.
>> They're trying to get to us.
>> Step out of the car.
>> Step out of the vehicle over here.
>> Step out.
>> Now,
>> not only did the officers smash the
window, but they also used pepper spray.
By law, police were allowed to do these
things only when they were in danger.
Now, you tell me, did this scene look
like they were in danger? Of course not.
But for them, the real threats seem to
be when someone hurts their ego and
refuses to hand over an ID, even when
the law gave them that right.
>> Exit the vehicle now.
>> Get out.
>> Hey,
>> put your hands behind your back. You are
under arrest. Hands behind your back.
You're under arrest.
>> Put your hands behind your back.
>> I'm not resisting. I'm not playing.
>> You are under arrest. Do not resist
arrest.
>> Resisting.
>> You're under arrest.
>> Hands behind your back. Hands behind
your back. You're under arrest.
>> I'm not resisting. I'm not.
>> Hey, don't treat my 15year-old like
that.
>> He's not doing anything.
>> Give him one second.
>> Be quiet. You're under arrest.
>> None of us are resisting.
>> Be quiet. You're under arrest.
>> None of us are resisting.
>> None of us are resisting.
You guys are attacking each other.
>> They got him. They're coming.
>> The police called it all routine
procedure. And in reality, it was an
example of disproportionate force and
abuse of power. When the law said
minimal necessary force, these guys read
it as maximum available force. They
twisted the rules to fit their own
actions and called it normal. And if
this didn't make your blood boil
already, what followed would push the
outrage to an even higher level.
>> 47.
>> We have three detained.
>> I'm ask for a second.
>> All right.
>> I'll get it. I'll get I'll get it.
>> 47.
That's too tight.
>> We need a second medic, please.
>> Ma'am, what is your name?
>> Ma'am,
>> where's my wallet at?
>> Judith, this should have never happened.
You hear me?
>> This should have never happened. You
should have cooperated with us.
>> Yeah, we got
My damn daddy. I'm not getting up.
>> I'm not getting up. I'm not doing
anything. I'm trying to stay on my side.
>> Do you have her ID right here?
>> Okay.
The officers explained that they had
sprayed three people with pepper spray
and that they needed a checkup. Yet,
they said it with complete indifference,
as if they were doing nothing more than
routine car service. Instead of
understanding the seriousness of the
injuries they had caused themselves,
they treated it as just a side effect of
their tactics. See for yourself how
little they cared. people just need them
checked out.
>> So, they're not cooperative.
>> They uh they're like sovereign citizens
type people. So,
>> pepper spray. We got three people, one
female and two males.
[Applause]
>> Hey, do me a favor, Mr. Rhyr.
Uh don't come down this way for me. All
right.
>> I wanted to
talk. I said you was tough up there when
you sprayed me face instead of getting
me out.
>> All right, do me a favor.
>> All right, I will. I'll stay back here.
>> Yep. Just go ahead and sit in your
truck. I'm coming and get you.
Judith and her husband were arrested and
charged with obstruction, assault, and
disobedience. At this point, it no
longer even mattered who was at fault
for the crash or whether they should
have received a fine. These dirty cops
get humbled when they face so-called
criminals because instead of showing
true authority, they show how long they
could fail just to protect their ego.
Sadly, they weren't the only ones. So,
let's talk about how another driver who
treated police with respect and still
ended up in jail. A driver from Maine
was traveling through Vermont when he
was stopped by officer Chapman. The
reason, he had hit the rumble strip on
the road. Instead of using the fifth
amendment and staying silent, he tried
to be polite and explained everything.
Unfortunately, that was exactly what the
officer had been waiting for. Video.
>> Hello, Ammeris police. You're being
audio and video recorded. Do you have
your license and registration?
>> I do have this, sir. Uh, it's in my
glove box. Uh, no weapons.
>> Okay. Where are you coming from tonight?
>> Maine.
>> Oh, you're coming from Maine?
>> Yeah, I'm going to visit my friend and
my father.
>> Whereabouts?
>> Battle, Vermont. So,
>> Vermont. Oh, okay.
>> Um, paperwork. I just I pulled over
because the lights were so bright.
>> Okay. The reason I stopped you
>> Yeah. Yeah. The headlights.
>> Yes, sir. That's why I pulled over.
>> Okay.
>> I figured not let's
>> Do you have the registration on you?
>> In my glove box, sir.
>> Okay.
>> No weapons.
>> Okay.
>> The driver without thinking gave
information that was never asked where
he came from, where he was going, even
that he had no weapons. To Chapman it
sounded like music. He only needed to
ask more questions and build suspicion.
The US law clearly said a citizen was
not required to answer questions except
to provide identification. And the only
mistake this man made during the stop
was that he did not know his rights.
I just went through eye surgery. So,
like that's why I pulled over because
like I don't usually drive at night.
Yeah. Uh I found that I found the
headlights to be too bright.
>> Gotcha. The reason I stopped you is cuz
you hit the rumble strip there.
>> I did, sir. Cuz
>> the lights
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. Do you have the registration
>> right here, sir?
>> Which one is it? Can you pull it out for
me?
>> Yes, sir.
>> I'd be courteous.
>> What's that? I just say I'd be 30 and
pull over passing.
>> Oh, okay.
>> And you live at Garden Way?
>> 11 Garden Way. 11 minutes.
>> Is that where you just came from?
>> Yes, sir.
>> Do you stop anywhere?
>> I get gas. Gas. I believe it was in
Portsouth.
>> Portsmith.
>> I put $20 in gas.
>> Okay. When was the last time you had a
drink of alcohol?
>> Just Just Gatorade, sir.
>> No, no, no. When When was the last time?
>> Uh, today is Well, it's it's Friday
night.
Wednesday.
>> You haven't had anything to drink before
you left tonight?
>> No, sir.
>> Okay.
>> Just haven't brushed my teeth.
>> Just haven't brushed your teeth. Okay.
>> Would you mind doing a couple tests for
me to make sure you're okay to drive?
>> Chapman immediately ordered him to step
out of the car. Instead of saying, "I
invoke my rights." The driver agreed and
even showed papers about his eye
surgery. In American law, this was a
classic trap. Every act of cooperation
was seen by the officer as weakness, not
goodwill. So, if you still thought that
being fair and polite with the police
meant everything would go smoothly,
you're about to see a very different
truth.
>> Okay, if I can just have you step out
here.
>> Yeah. Uh, forgive me. Uh, just I'm an
unbuckle, but
>> Yep.
>> I have paperwork right here, sir.
>> For what?
>> Eyes.
>> Oh, for your eyes?
>> I just went through eye surgery.
>> Yeah, but you you're okay to drive?
>> Yes, sir. I wouldn't have done it
otherwise.
>> Okay. That's all I really care about.
>> No, by all means, sir. Uh,
>> right back here.
>> Yes, sir.
One set them out. Test. Let me just shut
off the flashing lights. Um that way it
it'll help everybody see. If you just
want to stand over there, people uh tend
to not move over very far.
>> 110 out. Test.
>> Okay. All
right. I'm going to have you stand over
here and face me away from the lights of
the cars. Okay. I just want
>> Which way you want? Which way?
>> Right here. Yep. So, for this test, I
just want you to keep your feet together
and your hands down by your sides. Okay.
>> So, our military is behind the back.
>> Okay. Uh, next came the eye tracking
test. The man explained that he had
cataract surgery and that the light
bothered his eyes, but Chapman insisted
he followed the pen. Legally, this was
already a problem. When a medical
condition prevented the test, the result
was invalid. The officer knew this, but
the test was only an excuse to confirm
what he had already decided.
>> I want you to watch the tip of my pen
here with your eyes and your eyes only.
Do you understand that? Yes, sir.
>> Okay. Don't move your head at all. Just
watch with your eyes. And you just had
uh surgery. You said
>> cataracts and laser surgeries.
>> Okay. And you're you So you don't wear
contacts or anything?
>> I got the prescription. I I got to
purchase them, sir.
>> Okay. But you can see the pen just fine
here.
>> Yes, sir.
>> Okay.
>> All right.
Forgive me. Now I'm cold.
>> You're cold? Yeah. I just had to think
about
>> It's like 80° outside.
>> I know. Yeah.
[Applause]
The driver nervously apologized and
offered, "You can search my car." That
was mistake number two. The Fourth
Amendment protected against searches
without a warrant. But if you invite the
officer in, well, that becomes
permission. Chapman didn't even need to
ask to search the vehicle. It was enough
that this man was so scared he handed
over his rights on a silver platter.
>> Yep. Keep an eye on the pen. I'm sorry.
I was You spoke, so sorry. Yeah.
>> No, I didn't say anything.
>> Well, you said Yeah.
>> You're welcome to search my vehicle,
sir.
>> No, no, no. I don't want to search your
vehicle. I just want to make sure that
you're okay to drive. And you're telling
me that you haven't had anything to
drink?
>> I haven't, sir.
>> You smell like you've been drinking.
>> You're more than welcome to search my
vehicle, sir.
>> Why Why would I search your vehicle if
if I think that you've been drinking?
>> I haven't. explain why I haven't
>> in at least 24 to 48 hours.
>> Okay.
>> Just haven't brushed my teeth, sir.
>> Okay.
>> I have paperwork for my eyes.
>> I don't need any paperwork for your
eyes.
>> Chapman said that the driver smelled of
alcohol, even though there was no proof.
Interestingly, the law required probable
cause for further testing. Here, the
only evidence was that the man talked
too much and seemed nervous. But in the
American Police playbook, that was more
than enough to begin the sobriety show.
And what came next would push this
staged performance to a whole new level.
>> Yeah. Okay. Uh
>> I'm heading I'm heading to Broadway. So
>> yeah,
>> father and a and a female friend.
>> Okay.
>> My birthday is 8:228.
>> Okay, that's fine.
>> Yep. He's going to jail. That's way too
much information. And you can hear in
the officer's voice that he's having a
field day. He's like, I got this guy.
He's just giving me whatever I want. If
you don't know your rights, they're
going to use that fact against you.
>> My birthday is 82284.
>> Okay, that's fine. I don't need you to
ramble off random stuff. I just
>> It's a little odd.
>> What's that? What's odd?
>> I just pulled over to be polite cuz like
the lights.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Yep.
>> That's all it was.
>> Yeah. So, and the like I said, the
reason I stopped you is cuz you hit the
rumble strip. So, Uh
>> on the left.
>> Yep. On the left. There's no rumble
strip on the right.
>> No, the middle lane.
>> Yep. Well, there's no
>> The driver was forced to do the walk and
turn test. He explained that his ankle
had been broken several times, but
Chapman insisted. The irony, according
to the NHTSA rules, standardized field
sobriety tests should not be done on
people with orthopedic problems. In
other words, the test was invalid from
the very start. But Chapman wasn't
interested in rules. What he wanted were
handcuffs.
>> Middle lane. There's the yellow line.
>> Staying on ste.
>> Yeah.
>> No, I did, sir.
>> Okay. For this next test, I'm going to
have you stand over here.
>> Where's over here?
>> Right here. Okay.
>> Face that way.
>> Yes, sir.
>> Uh, I want you to put your right foot in
front of your left foot. Okay. Hands in
front of the left.
>> Yeah. Hands down by your sides. Do you
have anything wrong with
>> I've broken my ankles before? So,
>> are they broken right now?
>> Negative.
>> Okay. What do you do for work?
>> Uh, I'm unemployed at the moment.
>> Unemployment. See, that's another piece
of information the cop has put in his
mental rolodex to build a case against
this guy.
>> Okay. Uh, I'm going to have you put your
hands down by your sides. Okay.
>> Yes, sir.
>> When I tell you to start, I want you to
take nine heel to toe steps.
>> Nine.
>> Nine. Counting out loud like this.
>> One.
>> Two. Three. Till you get to nine.
>> Can I hold my hands out like this? I
need you to listen to what I'm saying.
Okay.
>> No, you're going to have I'm going to
have you keep your hands down to your
sides. Okay.
>> Take nine steps out. Once you get to
nine, I want you to take a series of
steps like this in a circle.
>> Then nine steps,
>> heel to toe, correct?
>> Yeah. Nine steps out. Heel to toe. Once
you get to nine, I want you to take
>> two. Three.
>> Hold on. Don't start till I tell you to.
The unlucky driver asked to take a
breath test instead of doing gymnastics
on the road, but it was too late.
Chapman was already forcing him to walk
nine steps forward, then nine steps
back. The man did it, counting clearly
and correctly, but the officer still
threw in extra instructions just to
confuse him. Do you see it now that this
was nothing but an excuse?
>> I want you to put your feet back where I
told you.
>> Yep.
When you get to nine, I want you to take
a series of short steps in a circle.
>> One moment, sir.
>> Okay.
You feel better without?
>> Yes, sir.
>> Okay.
>> Hands down by
>> Hands down by your sides. Don't stop.
Don't start till I tell you to.
>> I'm sorry, sir.
>> I've only explained half the test to
you. So,
>> you said nine steps heel to toe.
>> Yep. And then once you get to nine, I
want you to see take a series of steps
like this in a circle till you face back
the way that you came.
>> Understood.
>> Take nine heel to toe toe steps back.
Counting out loud like this. One, two,
three, till you get to nine. Okay.
>> Yes, sir.
>> Yes, sir.
>> During the test, I want you to keep your
hands down by your sides. Don't start
the test till I tell you.
>> I apologize. One.
>> Don't start start the test till I tell
you to. Stand back here.
When do I start? Then
>> when I tell you to start. Okay.
>> Yes, sir.
>> I need you to put your right foot in
front of your left, hands down by your
sides.
>> Yep.
>> Okay.
>> So, equilibrium.
>> Okay.
Keep your hands down by your sides
during the test.
>> Next came the one leg stand test. The
driver again said he had ankle problems,
but Chapman insisted. Instead of
recording the conditions that made the
test invalid, he ignored them. So the
man tried to balance while the officer
waited for him to stumble. All Chapman
needed was one excuse. You'd agree. And
that excuse was exactly what he was
about to seize.
>> If you fall,
>> Forgive me. I've broken my like my ankle
so many times.
>> Okay. Don't stop the test until you're
finished. Okay. Do you have any
questions?
>> You tell me when to start, sir.
>> Correct. I do.
>> I'm asking.
>> You're That was a question.
>> It was That was a question. Okay. Yes.
>> You tell me when to start, I will start,
sir.
>> Okay. Do you have any questions about
the test?
>> Honestly, I'm I'd rather do I'd rather
do a breathalyzer.
>> Yeah, bro is cooked. It's way too late
to ask to do a breathalyzer. He
shouldn't have even agreed to do the
field sobriety test.
>> I'm I'm completely sober. I'm just
tired.
>> Okay.
>> He's traveled four or five hours.
>> Well, I need to have you do these tests.
>> I'm not I'm not I won't do it. So, I
will do it.
>> Okay. Right foot in front of your left
foot. Hands down by your sides.
>> Yep. Begin whenever you're ready.
>> Now, now, now it's okay.
>> Now it's okay to start.
>> One, two, three, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
Swing. That's what you asked, correct?
>> That's half the test. Yeah. And then,
>> what's am I missing?
>> Nine heel to toe steps back.
>> Okay. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
>> Okay,
for this next test,
I want you to stand.
>> The driver kept trying to explain that
he was only tired and that the lights
bothered him. Chapman, of course,
ignored it and declared, "You can't
drive." The law clearly stated that
fatigue and lack of sleep were not
grounds for a DUI. But once an officer
marked suspicion, all logical objections
no longer mattered. And soon, Chapman
would take full advantage of that label
to justify what came next.
>> With your feet together, hands down by
your sides. Okay.
>> Okay.
Face away from the light, please. Like,
>> that's fine. Stand where? Yeah. As long
as you're not standing near the traffic.
>> Yeah. Yeah, by all means.
>> Okay. When I tell you to start, you pick
whichever foot you want. Lift it 6 in. I
want you to watch the your toe and count
by thousands like this.
>> Yeah. Don't start till I tell you.
>> Okay.
>> Watch your toe. Count 10,00 1,002 1003
until I tell you to stop. During the
test, I want you to keep your hands down
by your sides.
>> Understood.
>> Okay. If you drop your foot, pick it
back up. Don't Don't start till I tell
you to.
>> Yeah. I apologize.
>> Okay. Feet together, hands down by your
sides.
>> Yes, sir. I'm just pulling my hands.
>> Okay.
>> Feet together, hands down.
>> Yeah. If you drop your foot during the
test, pick it back up. Start back where
you left off.
>> How How much do you want me to count?
>> Until I tell you to stop.
>> Understood.
>> Okay.
>> Understood.
>> Pick a foot and go ahead and begin.
>> 1,000 2 1,000 3,000 4 1,000 5,000.
Sorry,
if I had my hands out to the balance.
>> Yep.
1 1,000 200,000 300 1,000 4 1,000 5
1,000 6 1,000 700,000
I can do more I guess. But yeah, and
then came the arrest. The irony. Up to
that moment, he had no breath test, no
blood test, and no valid reason beyond
his own judgment. But if the officer had
done everything by the book, it wouldn't
have worked in his favor, now would it?
He wouldn't have been free to do
whatever he wanted. And this was the
point where abuse of power became
undeniable. Just the the lights are so
bright.
>> You're not looking at any lights. I'm
looking into the lights.
>> It's reflecting. It's reflecting, sir.
>> It's reflecting off of my white face.
>> You know what to expect.
>> Okay. Watch what I'm doing.
>> Yeah.
>> Straight leg. Point your toe. Watch your
toe. Count by thousands. 100,00
1,002003.
Okay.
>> Yes, sir. 1 100 1,00 2 100 3 100 4 100 5
1 6 1 100 700
You didn't tell me how much, but
>> I told you to go until I tell you to
stop.
>> So it's my ankles.
I broke my ankles so many times.
>> Okay,
at this point I don't think you're okay
to drive. Okay, when we get back to the
police station, I'll give you the
opportunity to take a breath test.
>> The driver asked if he could at least
put on his shoes and lock his car.
Chapman refused. The law clearly stated
that police must avoid causing
unnecessary property damage, but it was
easier for him to just ignore it.
Ironically, the man had been fully
cooperative throughout the entire
encounter, and that was exactly what
destroyed him.
>> Sir, I'm not even trying to do anything
like that.
>> Uh, I'm not giving you the option. So,
>> you're under arrest. Turn around. Put
your hands behind your back.
>> May I May I secure my my vehicle, sir?
>> Nope.
>> I'm put my shoes back on. I'm not trying
to I'm not I'm not a threat. I'm
unarmed. I'm not trying to be a threat,
sir.
>> Did I put my shoes back?
>> Yeah, we'll get your shoes on.
>> I'm not a threat, sir.
>> Nobody said you were a threat.
>> No, but
What am I being incarcerated for?
>> What are you being what?
>> What am I being incarcerated for?
>> You're not being incarcerated. You're
being arrested for DUI.
>> I'm not under the influence, sir.
>> Okay. I'll give you the opportunity to
take a breath test. Maybe put my shoes
back on. So,
>> Yep.
>> So, now my car's getting towed.
>> Yes.
>> At the station, they presented him with
a testing form. Now he finally tried to
invoke his rights, mentioning the
fourth, sixth, and tenth amendments. The
problem here is that it was too late. By
then, he had already done everything
wrong, talked too much, agreed to the
tests, allowed the arrest. When you
start invoking your rights only at the
station, officers see it as nothing more
than games.
>> I can't afford that.
>> So, the body cam footage was 2 and 1/2
hours long. I have to cut quite a bit
out. So to summarize, they put him in
the back of the police car. He asks for
a supervisor. The supervisor comes and
he pleads his case to which the
supervisor of course says that, you
know, it's up to my officer. My officer
made the arrest. He saw what happened.
It's up to him. Um they take him back to
the police station and you know, it's
pretty much boring. It's the same thing
check-in thing, but there's one
particular part that I want y'all to
see.
>> All right, I'm going to go over this
form with you. Uh, I'm going to read
each line and ask you if you understand
after each one. Okay.
>> I don't understand any of them.
>> Well, I haven't read them to you.
>> I know
>> that's not a good start to be
uncooperative.
>> No, I'm not trying to say I'm
uncooperative. I just don't understand
any of them cuz I know my concept.
>> The officer read to him that he refused
the test. His driver's license would be
suspended. This was the so-called
implied consent law. In most states, a
driver had already agreed to a breath
test if requested by police. The irony
was that it was often used as blackmail.
Take the test or lose your license.
However, wait, there was still more to
this story and it was about to get even
messier.
>> Initutional rights.
>> What does that have to do with this? I
haven't even read it to you.
>> My fourth, my sixth, and my 10th
amendment is being violated right now.
>> No, it's not. So, I'm going to read
these to you. You can either cooperate
or not.
You've been arrested for an offense
arising out of active committed while
you're driving under the influence of
alcohol or drugs. Do you understand
that?
>> I don't understand.
>> That means that you've been arrested for
DUI.
>> I don't understand.
>> You are being asked to submit to a test
or test at the discretion of a law
enforcement officer in order to
determine the alcohol concentration in
your system. You may be asked to perform
a breath, blood, urine, physical test,
or any combination of these. Do you
understand that?
>> I already did so and I don't understand.
You have the right to an additional test
or tests of blood taken by a person of
your own choosing at your own expense.
Upon your request, you'll be given the
opportunity for such additional tests.
You also have the right to obtain a
portion of our sample of your blood for
testing at your own expense.
>> The driver argued that he hadn't
refused. He just didn't understand.
Chapman still insisted on marking it as
refusal. That way, he scored a double
win, a DUI charge and an administrative
penalty, license suspension. Everyone
could now see how the police used a
bureaucratic trick to win even when they
had no proof. And this trick was about
to seal the driver's fate completely.
>> You understand that?
>> Do you not understand?
>> If you submit to a blood, urine, or
breath test, which shows an alcohol
concentration of 08 or more, your New
Hampshire driver's license operative
operating privileges, nonresident
operating privileges, and boating
privileges in this state will be
suspended. Do you understand that? I do
not understand.
>> If you refuse to take the test or tests,
the refusal can be admissible in court.
Do you understand that?
>> I do not. I'm not refusing anything. I
just don't understand.
>> If you refuse to submit to a test or
tests requested by the officer, your New
Hampshire driver's license operating
privileges, non-resident operating
privileges, and boating privileges in
this state will be suspended. Do you
understand that?
>> Negative.
>> And are you going to sign this? Um, I'm
not signing anything, sir.
>> Okay, you are.
>> In the end, Chapman marked it as a
refusal and said, "That's it." The man
frantically repeated that he hadn't
refused. He just didn't understand. But
the game was over. The system didn't
care about nuances, only about the
checkbox on the form. And just like
that, a simple drive to visit family
ended in handcuffs, a tow truck, and
criminal charges.
>> A refusal?
>> No. No, I didn't refuse. I'm just
stating I don't understand and that's a
legal contract and it's not a contract.
>> You want to sign that you're refusing or
no?
>> I'm not refusing. I don't understand.
>> I just explained it to you. What don't
you understand? Cuz you're playing a lot
of games right now.
>> I'm not playing no games, sir. I do not
understand.
>> What don't you understand?
>> Everything.
>> You're playing games?
>> No, sir. No, sir.
>> Yes.
>> No, sir.
I am requesting that you take a breath
test. Would you like to take it or no?
>> I don't understand.
>> I'm letting you know that I'm marking
you down as a refusal.
>> That's your That's your opinion, not
mine. I did not refuse. I said
>> it was terrible that this happened only
because the man didn't know his rights.
So, let this be a lesson to all of you.
Always, and I mean always, defend your
rights no matter what. Even this wasn't
the last case where dirty cops got
humbled when they faced a criminal
because they ended up exposed. The next
case was about a man who was arrested
simply because of his skin color. The
driver's friend warned him to stop
talking to the police because every word
only built the case against him. The
basic rule from the US Constitution, the
fifth amendment, was clearly not part of
these officers training. Instead of
investigating the violation, the officer
approached with his gun in hand. It was
obvious the chaos had started from the
very beginning. But don't worry, it was
about to get even worse.
[Applause]
>> So, the reason why I'm stopping is for
reckless driving. You're reckless donuts
in the park.
>> That That's what I'm just saying. You
don't
>> The vehicle has smell the burnt rubber.
>> Yeah, that's what I'm saying. You just
You didn't see that being in
>> I saw you in the driver's seat. That's
what I saw. That's why I stopped.
>> Stop talking to the cops. Stop talking.
He's just building a case against you.
Stop talking to him.
The officer asked the passenger for ID
even though he wasn't under
investigation. In Texas, the Texas Penal
Code 38.02 clearly stated that you only
had to identify yourself if you were
lawfully arrested. When called out for
lying, he dodged the question and acted
like an expert. Then came the suggestion
to call a supervisor. And you know what?
If a cop doesn't like that idea, you can
bet they're hiding something.
>> Really, man? Gun out, bro?
>> Yes, sir. Mr. Miller,
>> gun out. You're You're a man. You need a
hug, man. I'll give you a hug if you
need to feel safe, bro.
>> Thank you for not pulling your gun out
on the passenger.
>> Yeah, tell them you're scared.
Tell them they need to send some cops
out that aren't going to pull their guns
on somebody doing
>> whatever he was doing.
>> You have a ID on you, sir?
>> But he don't have to ID, right?
>> Sir,
>> is he under arrest?
>> Is he under arrest?
>> Hey, Suarez, answer the question. Is he
under arrest? Yes or no?
>> Yes, sir.
>> So, does he have to ID if he's detained?
>> Yes, sir.
>> He does. You're You're a dumbass. Call a
supervisor.
>> Is there two suspects?
>> Give him. No. No. No. No, you're lying
to him. You're lying to him, sir. He
don't have to ID unless he's arrested.
And you know that, dumbass.
By the way, you don't have to ID unless
you're under arrest.
>> And you're not under arrest for [ __ ]
>> Yeah. I just like to comply.
>> No, comply is going comply is going to
get you shot.
>> Yeah, comply is going to get you shot.
Watch. Look at them all.
Hey, you can go back to patrol. While
one citizen tried to explain the law,
another officer calmly admitted that the
passenger actually didn't have to
identify himself. So, at least one of
them knew the law, but the passenger had
already handed over his ID because he
was told otherwise. A classic case of
manipulation. And soon that manipulation
would be used to push things even
further.
You can go back to patrol, man.
He's cool. He ain't going to pull his
gun out no more.
You really think I'm a cop? Nah.
>> Look at my look at look at my YouTube
channel.
>> And you can comply if you want. That's
cool. That's cool. That's what you feel
you need to do. But just so you know, if
you're not under arrest, you don't have
to ID and don't talk to him. Stop
talking to him.
>> That's what I told him. Stop talking to
him.
>> He knows. They all know who I am.
>> Question. Cuz he doesn't know the
answer.
>> What's up, Jack? Do you have to identify
yourself if you are being detained and
not under arrest? Who else?
>> Like this guy right here. Does he have
to identify himself if he is only being
detained and not under arrest?
>> Being detained?
>> Detained?
>> No, he didn't.
>> Yeah. The officer said, "So the officer
said, "Give me your ID." And I said,
"Hey, does he have to give you an ID? Is
he under arrest?"
>> Yeah.
>> He's being detained. And I said, "Well,
so he has to give it to you." And he
says, "Yes." So he lied to him about
getting his ID.
>> Okay. Well, I just got here. I don't
know what's going on. I just wanted to
see if I just wanted to see if one
officer knew the correct answer cuz he
doesn't Can you let him know that?
>> Yeah.
>> So, he can just give him back his ID cuz
he didn't want to give it.
>> Okay. Yeah. Like, let me see what's
going on. Um, right now,
>> one of the officers admitted that he had
just arrived, yet he was already
distancing himself from the chaos.
Still, no one returned that ID that had
been taken under false pretenses. The
law protecting against unlawful
retention and personal information.
Well, clearly unknown territory here.
Instead of fixing the mistake, they
continued standing in a fiveman
formation as if they were guarding the
president.
>> He probably needs to give him his ID
back. He didn't want to give it. Okay.
>> And the only reason he gave it is
because he lied to him.
>> So, let's get Can we just get that
right?
>> Awesome.
>> I appreciate that.
>> Oh, well, you're not sheriff anyway.
>> No.
>> No wonder.
>> I just got here. We got dispatch here.
>> That's They already, you know, conducted
a traffic stop. We're just here to make
sure everything's good.
>> I get it.
>> We're about to take off.
>> I get it.
>> So, I get it. So, we're here.
>> Where? Why?
>> Going over here.
>> Yeah. This guy right here, he's the one
that they said
>> like these guys are SAPD.
>> Real quick, but hanger.
>> Yeah, cuz he don't want to.
>> They're they're the ones that have
>> Let me go talk to the sheriff. I thought
you were sheriff.
>> Golly, it's bright.
>> Who's the supervisor
right now?
>> Why Why do I got to stand back over
there?
>> I'm just asking you, sir.
>> I I have a question, sir.
>> Okay. Well, my back is turned to you.
And then
>> now, if you still weren't sure what was
going on here, trust me, it didn't even
matter. Honestly, there was a good
chance the officers themselves didn't
know. What did matter was that after
this, these dirty cops were humbled
because they thought they had caught a
criminal. But let's get back to the
video and see what happened next because
things were far from over. We got five
officers here. You don't
>> It's just a polite request.
>> Do you know who I am?
>> I don't really care, sir. Can you please
>> I know, but do you know who I am? Yes or
no?
>> I don't care, sir.
>> I know you don't care.
>> Stand back over there, please.
>> You're Oh, you're the one that did the
MIP on the two and you searched them and
then you wrote that you didn't search
them. Dakota Cody. Uh uh. Wait, wait,
wait, wait. Stand back.
>> Dakota Cody, what? She doesn't mind.
>> We will be more than we more than
willing.
>> Well, you guys didn't do anything. They
did.
>> Wait, I will talk to you over there, but
let me talk to my officer right here.
Okay.
>> Okay. Can you wait over there, please?
>> When you're done.
>> Come on, man. You know what I'm going to
do?
>> I'm just going to film it.
>> But but Dakota did a MIP on two people.
Search.
>> Let's go talk over here.
>> Yeah, let's go talk.
>> Okay.
>> I'm glad I ran into you.
>> Okay.
>> So So quick question. Yeah.
>> Let me deal with him first and then I'll
talk to you. Okay.
>> Oh, that was tricky.
>> All right. No problem.
>> So,
>> what what are you all doing over here,
man?
>> No. Oh, so we was just chilling over
there and I guess some guy just came
asking for whatever.
>> A random guy walked up to
>> Yeah, we we know him. Yeah, you should
never ask answer questions because
>> what you're doing is you're
>> I forgot what it was called, but it's
like a trend. I guess
>> like a trend. You know what I'm saying?
>> A trend.
>> Yeah.
>> A trend. I don't know what a trend is.
>> Like, you know, like
a trend.
>> The officer admitted that you only had
to show ID if you were under arrest.
Yet, just a minute earlier, his
colleague claimed the opposite. In a
normal system, this would mean
correcting the mistake. Right here,
nothing happened. Honestly, it was
foolish for him to say this on camera.
Do you see how confident they were
knowing there would be no consequences
for them whatsoever?
>> Like you don't have to help him with
their investigation.
>> Anything like you know?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Like Tik Tok doesn't like like
that.
>> Okay, I got you.
>> So he's got an appointment. Let him
drive acting stupid in the car.
>> Yeah. He was doing donuts or whatever.
>> How do you know this guy?
>> Oh, that's that's my that's my cousin.
>> That's your cousin?
>> Yeah.
I don't think
as
>> you going to talk to me to Cody right
now.
>> That's what I thought. Run away. Run
away.
She knows I got all kinds of questions
for her anyway before she interrupted.
So she uh she got called by an offduty
deputy who was working at the theater,
right? And what they do is if somebody
pulls into the back parking lot when
she's bored, she'll sit there and wait
for the call and he'll call her on the
phone and then she runs over there real
quick. Everybody out of the car, hands
on the hood, searches them. She don't
write [ __ ] down. She don't find nothing,
get the out of here. What she tells me
she don't write nothing. You know the
problem with that. And that's just the
beginning. So
>> yeah,
>> I've been been following her for a
little while. I've never actually met
her face to face though,
>> okay?
>> Just been just been covertly following
her and watching her stops and things
like that. So, she does searches without
consent. While the driver calmly
explained that no violation had
occurred, the officers simultaneously
let him know the car would be towed. And
the reason, alleged reckless driving on
private property, but without written
permission from the owner, the police
had no authority to enforce a
misdemeanor law at that location. The
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure made
that boundary very clear. And private
was private, but not for these officers.
But she writes that she got consent or
she just searches and lets him go
without writing anything. She's a bad
one. And this dude right here, this dude
told this dude, well, he actually he
told me that, yeah, if you're being
detained, you have to give ID. And you
said no, you don't. Right. Because
that's the correct answer. Is that you
or you?
>> It was me.
>> It was you. Yeah. And you know that too,
right?
The only time I have to give you
identification is if I'm under arrest.
>> You're detaining me for something. I
should probably just shut up until
you're done figuring out if I committed
a crime or not. Right.
>> Right. It's always okay to comply and
give it to them. Nothing wrong with
that. But I don't
>> Once they're Once they're done, we'll
get we'll get your ID back real quick.
>> We'll go.
>> Like like I said, I don't know.
>> Was your cousin the one driving?
>> Huh? Huh? Was your cousin the one drive?
>> Nah. I mean, when when y'all first when
y'all first came, that's when we got
into the car and it was illegal.
>> I tell you, man.
>> The problem with talking to the police
is he's going to if he talks to him and
your stories don't match,
>> he's not you're not going to jail.
>> Yeah. No, no, no. He'll tell you
everything.
>> But yeah, I know. But I'm just saying
I'm just saying generally speaking.
>> Yeah.
>> Like when you're like uh let's say you
say, "Oh, he's my friend." Well, what's
his name? Let's say you only know him by
his nickname. Yeah.
>> And that's all you know him by and
you're actually telling the truth and
you say and they're like, "Well, that's
not his."
>> The officer began a school style lecture
about how you can be arrested for
reckless driving on private property if
you endanger others. It sounded nice,
but without a witness or a complaint, it
was pure speculation. When there's no
real danger, the scenario of maybe
you'll run someone over becomes the same
as accusing someone of maybe you'll rob
a bank because you have hands.
>> So, he's not your friend, is he? Well,
really when really he is, but now
they're saying you're lying. All because
you just know him by your You see? And
that they're not trying to help you,
man. They're not trying to help you.
They're trying to be
>> You have anything you need to get out of
the vehicle?
>> Uh, no. Why? My charger.
>> Yeah. You want to grab it out of the
vehicle? The vehicle's going to get
towed.
>> Wow.
>> For reckless driving, dealing with
donuts.
>> Yes, sir.
>> Hey, check with the property owner and
make sure that they didn't allow that.
This is This is private property.
>> Oh, this is going to be good.
>> Man, got to get the owner of the
property.
>> Unless you got a Unless you got a
written declaration that y'all can
enforce trespassing, which y'all don't.
Not on this one.
All right, guys. So, this is private
property. They have not checked with the
owner. If they did, they'd find out that
they have permission to be here.
>> The sheriff pull up and they came and
saw him doing donuts,
>> bro. He didn't see this car doing [ __ ]
>> I don't know.
>> Now, we got that all on camera.
Now, we ain't we ain't, you know, we
ain't trying to support any kind of
breaking the law, but we are here to
catch when an officer stops a car that
wasn't doing nothing.
>> The citizen replied with the same logic.
if they could arrest him for the
possibility of endangering someone, they
could also charge him with a murder that
might happen. The police, of course,
dismissed the comparison, but the truth
remained. There was no victim and no
complaint here. Just because they had
caught real offenders in the past didn't
give them the right to invent guilt
today, now did it? And says he was
reckless driving and we got it on
camera. He wasn't.
Now, officer might have saw a car, but
it wasn't that one.
>> Not that true.
>> It was not that one. It's okay. You guys
are cool. Yeah, you guys are out of
this.
>> So, you understand, you can't you can be
you can't be given a ticket or you can
be taken to jail for reckless driving on
private property as long as you're
putting other people in danger.
>> Who's a complainant?
>> I'm sorry.
>> Who's a complainant?
>> You don't need you don't need a
complaint.
>> You don't need a complaintant.
>> Okay.
>> Not if you're not for reckless driving.
>> Who was who was in danger?
>> H
>> who was in danger?
>> Anybody else that he may have been doing
the
>> because that's what's going to be asked
for. my to my understanding is what was
going on from from the calls that we had
we had we had calls for over 20 cars
that were out here doing donuts. So what
I would imagine what the the situation
would have been was that whoever is
doing donuts was putting the other
people in the area in the same parking
lot at danger because if you lose
control of the car, you recognize
somebody else or god forbid you lock
somebody's leg off or you run into them
while you're doing that. That's how you
put people in danger doing reckless
driving. Unless that's that's like
saying you could throw handcuffs on me
because I'm armed and I might shoot you
>> and you might as well just put handcuffs
on me and charge me with murder cuz
that's possible, right?
>> You can go down rabbit holes all day.
>> It's poss
and we when we got here, you know, we
saw
>> No, no, no. Y'all didn't Y'all y'all
would have probably pulled over a car
that y'all saw doing that,
>> right?
>> Yeah. And that would be totally okay.
>> Done that before.
>> And that would be totally cool. And I've
the citizen admitted that he usually had
no problem with police doing their job
correctly. But when he saw a gun pointed
at an innocent person, well, that was
the line. This was the core of the
problem. Using force before there was
proof of any offense, the right to
peacefully assemble and record public
officials was protected by the First
Amendment. But some officers saw it as a
personal insult and not a civil right.
>> Seen you guys already over the past
month do that,
>> right? like like legitly pull over cars
that are breaking the law and I don't
say [ __ ] to y'all. I don't walk up on
you. I just film. I say thank you and I
have a nice night.
>> But whenever I see the cops pull get out
with a gun pointed at him at a car that
wasn't doing nothing, I got a problem
with that. You know what I'm saying?
That's what I got a problem with. You
understand?
>> If you're doing your job, I got no
problem with you.
>> Like I'm not I'm not giving you a hard
time because you know you even answered
the photo ID question correctly. Yeah.
>> So, I got no reason to give you a hard
time. And uh I have no doubt that you
guys would have Well, I know Shaw. I I
know who Shaw is. I don't know who you
are. I've seen you out often. So, I know
you guys, you know, I have no reason to
doubt that you guys would have only
pulled over somebody or made a stop on
somebody you saw break a law. That's not
what he did. So, that's why I got the
issue with him.
>> Understand?
>> So, that's all.
>> Hey, you got a video,
>> huh?
>> Where he was on donuts?
>> Who wants it?
>> Hell him over here. Yeah, I know you got
the video.
>> The only way I'll give you my video off
my camera is slap you upside
then you can download it that way. He
knows better than to ask me. Shut up.
Shut up.
>> What do you mean about
>> shut up? Shut up.
>> Shut up. Shut up.
>> I don't Well, just in case.
>> Wait. So, I would appreciate if you
didn't talk to me that way.
>> Just in case you're as stupid as you
look and you want my video. There's only
one way to get it. I'll download it to
your
>> I don't want your video.
>> Okay, that's good. Cuz then I'd have to
go to Joe after I download it. The
situation escalated when the citizen was
threatened with arrest for interference
simply because he criticized a female
officer for illegal searches. Texas
Penal Code 38.15
clearly stated that criticism and
recording were not interference unless
you physically obstruct their work. But
here interference meant you said
something we don't like.
>> Okay, that's great.
>> And Dakota, you need to stop searching
people illegally without consent.
You need to write it on your citations
that you searched. Shut up.
>> Walk away cuz you're going to be
arrested for interfering, sir.
>> How am I interfering?
>> Where do you want me to stand? Where do
you want me to stand?
>> You just came over here yelling at us
cuz we're trying to deal with the video.
>> It was a mistake. I thought that y'all
wanted my video.
>> No, if you wanted to ask me a question,
do it in a quiet manner.
>> Okay.
>> Talk to me the way I'm talking to you.
>> So, it's it's the it's it's not my
speech that's interfering. It's what I'm
saying.
>> It's the fact that you come over here
yelling at us. And then also threaten
this.
>> I wasn't threatening. I was I was just
letting you know.
>> I let you know if you wanted my video.
There's only one way you could get it.
>> You can go stand over there if you would
like.
>> But you're not going to want my video.
So there's nothing that's going to
happen, right?
>> Okay, then stop talking. Don't be
careful.
>> I don't have to stop talking.
>> Okay. Well, then just stop. Let us do
what we need to do. Okay. That's all
we're asking. I
>> I'm not Do what you got to do. I'm just
filming.
>> Did you find it?
>> I'm getting it right now.
You want to do the
>> He He didn't see that car do [ __ ] We
got
>> The whole situation was the result of
unchecked information, false claims, and
ignored rights. No one had seen the
driver doing donuts. There were no
damages and no complaint from the
property owner. Yet, guns were pointed,
ID was taken through deception, and
threats of charges were made. So, what
would you have done if you were in these
people's shoes? If you think this was
bad, well, just wait, because the next
video is going to shock you even more.
Some cops take corruption and abuse to a
whole new level, proving there's no
limit to how low they'll go. Stick
around because what you're about to see
will make you question everything even