A public recording turns into a constitutional clash when an officer detains a man for filming with no clear cause. This is what happens when authority is forced to justify probable cause. >> So am I under arrest? Are you going to arrest me for filming in public? Listen. I don't need to listen to your >> I'm stopping you because you're filming the kid. >> Do you understand that this is public? Am I being detained? >> You are being detained right now. >> What articulable reasonable suspicion of a crime have I committed >> Okay. that made you detain me, sir? Why why do I continue to answer that question specifically if I've already made >> Cuz you haven't stated a law that says I can't film a child in public. >> to film a child. >> Are you ridiculous, dude? Am I free to go, sir? >> not free to go. Who is your supervisor? >> His name is uh Sparkman. Your name and badge number, sir. >> It's Officer Horton. Badge number ZH462. And you're his supervisor? What's your name and badge number, sir? >> Officer Sparkman, ZH469. [ __ ] detain me illegally, sir. You're not detained. You can go. He detained me, sir. So I'm free to go and I'm free to stay. [ __ ] you, officer. >> No probable cause, no clear statute, just power being tested against constitutional limits.